"Change" We've Been - and Will Be - Haunted By

In either the days before or right after Barack Obama's election victory, I recall of one his public relation hacks running around the cable "news" shows proclaiming that his administration would not be comprised of "retreads." I'm still trying to find the exact quote(s), but in the meantime, the sickening and endless proclamations of "change" are plenty proof positive that this is all a colossal hoax.

There is no question that any incoming president needs a strong, experienced supporting cast. I have no issue at all with the selection of Joe Biden as Vice President. I did think that Hillary Clinton - especially considering the covert meeting with her and Barack at the 2008 Bilderberg gathering - was undoubtedly the selection here, but Biden is certainly a viable choice. And for that matter, Hillary is strong pick for Secretary of State.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=2560

And as more of the upcoming administration plays itself out, it becomes clearer exactly why Hillary so easily gave up VP for State Department. I've written before I thought there was no way. Evidently there was some wheeling and dealing however in the form of a strong trade off, as this is rapidly becoming the third Clinton administration.

As for some of Obama's other new minions of "change," there's no better place to start than with the hated Neo-Cons.

Robert Gates has been tabbed to stay on as Defense Secretary. But how can you argue with this? Keep the appointee of a a Neo-Con administration that is perhaps the least popular in U.S. history and has orchestrated two completely disastrous wars. Yes, he's probably not as bad as Rumsfeld, and that's exactly the key point. He helps retain a certain modicum of anti-Muslim, Middle East crusade rhetoric under a guise of lesser of evils.

The 'You Absolutely Must Be Joking' award of Obama's appointments can gp to none other than the appointment of Tim Geitner - New York Federal Reserve head - as Treasury Secretary. It's not enough that almost all of our current economic problems stem from the fact that we have a [Non] Federal [with absolutely no] Reserve[s]. Let's go and appoint the governor of its biggest branch to be our next Henry Paulson. Geitner is also a disciple of former Clintonians Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/11/25/opinion/main4632754.shtml

Following closely behind Geitner is good old Larry Summers himself - elitist Harvard bigwig and former Treasury Secretary under Clinton.

Former Federal Reserve chair Paul Volcker - who during the Carter regime helped to completely dismantle the economy - is right there, too, as chief economic advisor.

http://www.deepjournal.com/p/7/a/en/1782.html

Tom Daschele gets the nod as Secretary of Health and Human Services. The former South Dakota senator is admittedly a mixed bag. On the one hand, he was one of the targets of the infamous government-run anthrax attacks of late 2001, no doubt signaling he was out of favor with the elite. However, there are sickening aspects to his resume. Not the least of which are his 2006 endorsement of warrantless spying, and the fact that his wife, Linda Hall, is a top Washington lobbyist - and was acting administrator of the FAA during the Clinton years.

Finally, and perhaps most notorious, is Chief of Staff nominee Rahm Emanuel - who happens to be Obama's first appointment of any kind. A former Clinton White House advisor, he is nothing but an Israeli loyalist, anti-Islamic thug of the worst variety. It sickens me to even think or write about him or his father, Benjamin. Just google them.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/browse_thread/thread/1ae488d5cff26a28?pli=1

The web is weaved even far more intricately, but I frankly don't have the stomach to go on. Research it for yourself.

This isn't change, it's a reunion. All cleverly masked by horrifyingly messianic-like support from the world, and absolutely no consideration for facts.

Utter the word change - as long as you don't look like the previous 43 presidents - and there can be no doubt that you in fact stand for change.