Charlie Sheen's Heroics Mark 8-Year Anniversary of Self-Inflicted Wound

As the twilight of the 8th anniversary of the 9/11 inside job approaches, it is the heroic actions of Charlie Sheen over the past few days that shine brightest.

First, it was Tuesday's exclusive release of Sheen's mock interview with President Obama on Alex Jones's infowars.com site.

http://www.infowars.com/twenty-minutes-with-the-president

The piece, one of the most creative and courageous things you will ever see, was intended to rekindle fervor for a new 9/11 investigation, get the attention of the MSM and the Administration, and catapult a mega-star back into the 9/11 Truth spotlight.

Why was this necessary? First off, Sheen is the brightest star yet to go to bat for the Truth, and all other stars have taken a lukewarm, and marginally-informed stance. Charlie knows the history and the data inside-out. He's admittedly - and obviously - done a boat-load of research. Secondly, it's been three years since he went public on Alex's show. The air of the 9/11 Truth movement has thinned a bit. Someone other than Alex, Jason Bermas, WeAreChange, and the academics and scholars needed to infuse some life back into the cause. Charlie stepped up.

Seemingly most important, though, was Charlie's own mind and soul. He's an admitted Obama voter in 2008, and he feels burned. Much the same way EVERY Obama voter should feel. Obama has done nothing to retract Bush's tyrannical police state policies. Not surprising, since he answers to the same puppeteers, but nonetheless, he needs his chance to either do the right thing and promote "change," or be held to the same scrutiny as his retarded predecessor. For this, Sheen is willing to give Obama a chance to answer some legitimately tough questions.

http://www.infowars.com/charlie-sheen-requests-meeting-with-obama-over-911-cover-up

Over the past three days, Sheen has had to endure yet another round of endless, mindless attacks from Neo-Con, war-loving shills everywhere from Limbaugh to O'Reilly, from Hannity to that wretched daughter of John McCain. The entirety of any of their retorts is laughable, but what gets me most are the endless references to Charlie Sheen's being the "latest celebrity to join the 9/11 Truth fringe."

Of course, Charlie was one of the first - more than three years ago.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/sheen_questions_official_911_story.htm

Every American owes a great deal of gratitude to Charlie Sheen. He has more to lose and is still speaking up more than just about anyone.

As for the lambasting he's taking, it's the latest and greatest example of a pathetic, complicit, evil, retarded and bumbling MSM. To say he's the latest public figure in the movement is akin to saying that fires brought down the towers or cell phones mysteriously worked at 30,000 feet on 9/11/01.

Time for Obama to Shut Up, Put Up

As I write this there are no less than 100 of my 200 or so co-workers drooling on themselves mesmerized by the television as Barack Obama gives his inauguration speech as the 44th President of the United States. Countless others are doing the same at their desks via CNN.com or any of the other shill online news outlets.

When the smoke clears later this afternoon, Bush and Cheney will have made their long overdue exit, and we will finally get to see exactly what kind of "change" we're in for. Now-President Obama certainly has delievered enough empty promises of change, and has seemingly fleeced the better part of the entire globe. For our nation - and the world as a whole - hopefully he meant it, and will indeed deliver the kind of change people thought they were voting for.

Sadly, it's probably not going to resemble such a scenario one bit. After all, let's not forget that presidents are puppets - controlled by the Bilderbergers. And as I've covered in some detail in previous posts, Obama has surrounded himself with some frightening characters.

New Rule: Questioning 9/11 and the War Equates to Insider Trading

In the latest laughable attempt to tear down anyone in or around the Truth Movement, the SEC has targeted Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban with an insider trading civil suit, and the players involved just can't stop talking about Cuban's involvement (or lack of for that matter) with Loose Change: Final Cut.

Even a lying rag like the New York Times seems to have the story straight. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/business/18insider.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1227121888-JG/dErpLA4Gt7BzyXmS8ug

According to the NYT story, [A person close to Mr. Cuban provided what he said was one of a series of e-mail messages from Jeffrey B. Norris, an S.E.C. lawyer in Fort Worth, who accused the billionaire of being unpatriotic for helping to finance a movie named "Loose Change." In the e-mail message, Mr. Norris described the movie as a “vicious and absurd documentary” that “posits that President Bush planned the demolition of the World Trade Center as a pretext for going to war against Iraq.”]

It continued, [In the e-mail message, sent from his S.E.C. e-mail address, Mr. Norris said he was informing Christopher Cox, the chairman of the S.E.C., of Mr. Cuban’s actions.
“If this upsets you, I wonder how George Bush feels,” Mr. Norris wrote. “I assume that Mr. Cox would view your involvement with ‘Loose Change’ much as I do. After all, he served his country as a Republican congressman from Orange County for nearly 20 years and was appointed by President Bush.”]

As is the case 99.9% of the time when it comes to slamming 9/11 Truth, this is complete bull. Cuban never financed a red cent of LCFC, the film in no way contends that Bush planned the WTC demolitions, and what does any of this have to do with a SEC suit?

Sadly this is of little to no surprise after all these years. Whether it's Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell or Willie Nelson, the media retards and all other servants of the global elite elate at ruining celebrities that dare question their masters or speak the truth.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=6053

This is just the latest and greatest. It shows yet again that the movement is gaining a foothold, it's having a great effect waking people up, and it's scaring the heck out of the powers that be and their minions.

Suddenly Bush's Approval Rating Is Such Headline News

Now that the savior has landed on planet Earth, we need not worry about a thing. Food will magically appear on your family's dinner table, your mortgage will pay itself, race relations will improve overnight, and suddenly CIA-controlled bearded cave dwellers in turbans will go the way of the raptor.

So much has suddenly and mystically changed in the United States - and the world for that matter - since last week that it's now safe for the corporate media to forsake their darling Neo-Con idols.

Only now that we have Lord Obama can the elite comfortably trumpet everywhere that George W. Bush's approval rating is abysmal - in fact, the lowest ever.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/10/bush.transition.poll/

In the latest polls, it appears that a mere 24 percent of the public approve of the Chimp in Chief. This compared to lows of Clinton, Father Bush, Nixon and Carter. But this isn't news. You can go back as far as nearly three years ago and find Bush was already at all-time lows of around 30-35 percent approval. Today, though, it's in sync everywhere from CNN and Bloomberg, to news outlets in Australia and Scotland.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/27/opinion/polls/main1350874.shtml

Funny how up until the past week, you'd have been hard pressed to name the last time Dubya was invoked in the media for any reason. Now it's sheik though. The Neo-Cons are gassed. Cheney is suddenly stricken with heart problems again, and Bush looks horrible when he actually is captured on camera. Add to that the Left has its liberal facade of "change."

Where was the MSM during the past years, however, when the same Neo-Cons were running around annihilating the Constitution, illegally invading sovereign nations, and torturing and/or killing innocent women and children of third-world countries?

Today was an open invitation though for an approval rating juxtaposition.

The Obama clan made its way to the White House for the latest dog and pony show. Barack, his two children, and his wretched Council on Foreign Relations wife paid George and Laura a visit. The festivities were full of fake admiration, phony compliments, and sickening photo ops. Not that this was any different than during the Clinton-Bush transition.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/11/10/dnt.ok.no.obama.newspaper.kjrh

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/290807_obama_cfr.html

Oh, how the wind blows.

Alright, Lord Obama, Let's See Some "Real Change"

We've heard it for months. Two extremely bland words strung together to convey and connote absolutely nothing. Real. Change.

Of course the mesmerized public bought the siren song wholesale, and here we are - saddled with a president who's accomplished nothing politically, who completely phoned in his public service in the Senate for the past year - barely casting a single vote - and when he did, it was to support the criminal Wall Street bailout, and fall in lock step with the Neo-Cons.

So while Barack Obama emptily promises change, what it is that he really should do beginning in January to truly affect change?

Paul Joseph Watson at Prison Planet laid it out perfectly in a great article this morning. He called Obama out with laser like efficiency.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/will-obama-change-the-bush-police-state-or-expand-it.html

"Let’s be generous and give Obama the whole four years of his initial term to make significant progress on the following issues," Watson writes. "Here are some questions about 'change' that we are going to be keeping track of until 2012. "

- Will Obama repeal Patriot Acts I and II as well as reversing Bush’s signing statement and acknowledging the repeal of the John Warner Defense Authorization Act?

- Will Obama support Dennis Kucinich’s efforts to bring war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and others for deceiving the country into a war or will he protect them against such charges like Nancy Pelosi has done?

- Will Obama bring war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and others for authorizing torture and will the torture of suspects under U.S. detention, a complete violation of both the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions, cease under an Obama administration?

- Will Obama withdraw American troops from Iraq and Afghanistan without sending them away again to bomb another broken-backed third world country in the name of a UN-supported “humanitarian” war?

- Will Obama end the warrantless secret surveillance and phone-taps of American citizens?

- Will Obama follow through on his rhetorical support for the second amendment or will he seek to ban guns as he did in Illinois?

- Will Obama cease his support for the Bush-administration backed banker bailouts, hated by the majority of Americans, and target the real cause of the problem - the Federal Reserve - or will he continue to give taxpayers’ money to banks who are merely hoarding it all for themselves?

- Will Obama seek to continue the militarization of America and preparations for martial law through Northcom and the secret government or will he dismantle the police state that has been constructed over the last eight years by the Bush administration?

Great job as always by Watson. Let us just hope that we'll continue to be able to read articles at Prison Planet and write blogs like this one come next year - without being labeled a terrorist, anti-American, or sadly, even a racist.

With the way the public reacted last night, you'd have thought Christ, Muhammed, Yahweh, Beelzebub, Marvin the Martian, or whoever folks worship, had landed in Chicago's Grant Park. It was scary.

Now let me be clear. I completely understand the joy black voters must have felt. They've waited a long time for this, and they deserve to rejoice in the moment. However, it was the reaction of the white voters that was so disturbing. You'd have thought they just had their own 200-year-old slate cleaned. And based on what? Absolutely nothing but blind, mindless worship. These are folks who while hating Bush and his policies will now love the same agenda over the next four years.

Oh, and Revered Jackson, you piece of garbage, get one thing straight. Anyone in the know is well aware you couldn't care less about black people. You care about money and your fake image. Take your crocodile tears and drown them - along with yourself - in Lake Michigan.

Initial Reactions to the Dog and Pony Finale

In no great surprise, Barack Obama has been elected the 44th President of the United States within the past hour. My past posts should speak for my feelings about this, so I'll lay off of our "lord" and "savior" for now and let him have his night.

As for the rest of them - Joe Biden, as Vice President elect, takes a huge step from the strobe lights of the Democratic senate into the limelight. Hopefully this will help illuminate the fact that he's deeply involved in the 9/11 attacks, having met on 9/13/2001 with Mahmood Ahmed, head of the Pakistani ISI. Ahmed, of course, is alleged to have wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta in the week leading up to the attacks.

John McCain will go back to being a Senator, and more notably, a very sick cancer patient. In a way it was sad to see him trotted out there by the establishment to take an embarrassing fall. No doubt he's a Neo-Con piece of garbage, but between the cancer, the Vietnam War, and his advanced age, it's questionable he even knows what's going on half of the time anymore.

If poetic justice does indeed exist, Sarah Palin will get jumped by a pack of hungry bears and dogs on her way back to her igloo. She is an absolute hypocritical, possibly retarded piece of filth who had no business being on the television over the past few months. Even though the whole election process is a joke in and of itself, she did nothing but further ruin our nation's image and reaffirm to the rest of the world that we're a bumbling mess. Talks of her being a GOP force in 2012 are laughable.

We still have two and a half months of the Neo-Cons left, but they're clearly out of gas. Cheney suddenly has heart problems again and you can rest assured you won't see him anymore. Bush for his part looks absolutely haggard during his sporadic appearances.

Now we wait to witness the fruition of all the recent predictions of imminent disaster upon Obama's election.

Some Congressional Races of Note

While the entire globe is mesmerized and diverted from reality by the dog and pony show of Obama/Biden vs. McCain/Palin, there are hundreds of congressional races taking place tomorrow as well; battles that are unquestionably more important than the puppet play at the forefront of the 24/7 cable "news" propaganda sessions.

At face, I believe that at least 95 percent of incumbent members of Congress should be voted out. They comprise a pack of cowardly criminals that on the Right have fell lock step with the Neo-Cons, and on the Left, have completely betrayed their base after the 2006 Congressional election shakeup - failing to stand up to the Neo-Cons and playing - to a tee - the flip side of an evil coin.

The complete support and promotion of two illegal wars. The support (albeit under the duress of Martial Law - yes, and don't roll your eyes) for the immoral Wall Street bailout. The perpetuation of illegal spying on the American people. And on and on and on.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/october2008/031008Sherman.htm

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Representatives-Were-Threa-by-Patrick-Henningsen-081004-301.html

Still, there are a few incumbents who not only should keep their job but who truly are champions of the constitution and the American people. There are also a few challengers who we should all hope steal the day.

Naturally, everyone - regardless of their party, location, platform, et. al - have their own slate of races they consider important. I'm not downplaying any congressional races here, only pointing out those which I feel most strongly about. Others should certainly do the same. The races I note -for the most part - are not competitive one way or the other. All the same, they mean something great to me personally.

1) Texas, 14th District - Dr. Ron Paul is running for his 11th term as a United States Representative after a historic presidential run - raising nearly $5 million while being completely blacked out by the MSM. There is no Democratic challenger (they weren't dumb enough to waste even $1 to trot one out against the Ron Paul Revolution). There are three Independent candidates, and while I support Independent candidates' campaigns - in theory - in 99% of scenarios, don't even try to mess with the Good Doctor. He's proven himself not only a people's champion outside of Texas, outside of the so-called Right Wing, and outside of the mainstream Republican Party, but outside of the entire criminal government currently enslaving us.

2) Ohio, 10th District - Dennis Kucinich appears safe to retain his seat against GOP challenger Jim Trakas, despite a myriad of money and lies leveled at the House's leading maverick. Kucinich has had an outstanding 2008. Not only did he throw his hat into a fruitless presidential fight against establishment shills Clinton and Obama, but he has tirelessly fought on the House floor for the impeachment of both George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Like Ron Paul, he also voted twice against the "bailout."

3) New Jersey, 5th District - Incumbent Neo-Con piece of filth Scott Garrett needs to go. There is no more plain and truthful way to put it. During the past year I moved from NJ-5 to NJ-9, but have not changed my registration info. Thus, I will return to NJ-5 to vote against Garrett. In short, if you need the skinny on him, visit http://retiregarrett.blogspot.com/.

4) Minnesota, U.S. Senate - Talk about a carnival. Here you have incumbent Neo-Con trash Norm Coleman pitted against semi-amusing comedian Al Franken. A parade of fools if we've ever seen one. Well, enter Dean Barkley - an independent who has actually served two months in the U.S. Senate. He was appointed by then-Governor Jesse Ventura to serve out the stint of Paul Wellstone after the bizarre and convenient plane crash of 2002. As of late last week, Barkley was polling between 17 and 20 percent, and had received around $40,000 in donations from listeners of the Alex Jones Show after a dual appearance by Barkley and Ventura on the show. Barkley has a real shot tomorrow.

5) New Jersey, 9th District - Incumbent Dem Steve Rothman is a pretty good guy. I covered him for two years (1999-2001) during my stint in North Jersey journalism, and he really did get a whole lot of positive stuff done for his constituency. He voted against the bailout on the first go-around and for it on the second, but as I mentioned above, there was the threat of Martial Law. In fairness, I think you can only judge the House members on their first vote for that reason alone. He is my current Rep, but he's pretty much a lock to win. I'd rather go back "home" and vote against Garrett.

Leading Japanese Politician Questions 9/11 for the Third Time; Envokes Paul, Kucinich

Last Wedensday, Japanese Diet member Yukihisa Fujita once again questioned the official 9/11 fairy tale on the floor of the Japanese equivolent of Congress.

Alex Jones interviewed Fujita back in March of this year, at which time one of the leading members of the Japanese opposition party suggested that the United Nations lead a new investigation into the alleged terrorist attacks.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2008/033108_un_investigation.htm

"This is something Parliamentarians of various countries could ask - I was in Europe meeting with European MP's and they are also thinking about asking the UN to investigate, so these kind of efforts need to be done internationally," said Fujita, adding that he had visited eleven different European countries in an attempt to garner support for the move.

Last week's speech to the Japanese parliament included a call to to stop all Japanese support for U.S.-led military operations, citing heavy civilian and military losses in Iraq and Afghanistan.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=5624

Wow. How refreshing. Imagine one of the leaders of either criminal party in this country suggesting such a thing.

Fujita reportedly went on to describe the Kucinich impeachment debate in Congress and its support by members of the House. He went on to list to the Japanese parliament Congressman Kucinich's 35 articles of impeachment against President Bush, and also mentioned Dr. Ron Paul in regards to the impeachment of our puppet president.

Reports say that although there was no public broadcast of Fujita's speech, that this is - in fact - the third time he's called out the 9/11 fable on the Japanese parliament floor.

Fujita is a member of the Democratic Party of Japan. He also pointed out that there has never been an official police investigation into the deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.

Get Ready for the Next Fake Bin Laden Tape

Former "counter-terrorism" czar and criminal conspirator Richard Clarke planted the latest seeds of terror in the public's psyche yesterday when he said that Osama bin Laden would try to influence the upcoming election via a new video tape.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=5525

When are they going to stop with this? There hasn't been an original Osama video in seven years, and the likelihood is that he's been dead for about that long.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

http://www.infowars.net/articles/november2007/291107Laden.htm

But, just as in Orwell's nightmarish 1984, the government needs its bogeyman up on the big screen. And each and every time one of the lying cable news shows gives this any coverage without calling it out as a fake, they are complicit in bald face lying and a massive cover up. Not that they care though.

Back to the newest pack of lies...

Clarke (and countless others) maintain that bin Laden helped Bush win the 2004 election by "implying that he supported Kerry" via one of the CIA-produced videos released in the Fall of that year. Well, it must have been him. It certainly wasn't fraudulent voting machines, or the fact that tens of thousands of voters were turned away in urban parts of Ohio and denied their constitutional right to vote.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A64737-2004Dec14?language=printer

Of bin Laden, Clarke said, “So, we know he likes to try to influence elections. So, we can look forward to perhaps another video tape like that, or an attack. But an attack is a heck of a lot harder for them to stage than the easy job of putting out a video tape.”

Great point Richard. It is indeed harder for the rogue elements of our government to pull off another 9/11 than it is for them to go into the editing room and throw another CGI Osama together.

Paul's Common Sense Against Bush's Talking Points - Yet Again

I really have nothing new to say about the U.S. Markets, the bailout of the Robber Barrons, and the complete criminality going on except that it's so pathetic we still have shills on the TV telling us we're not going to be able to avoid a "recession."

We're already in a recession, perhaps a depression, you jackasses! How much longer can the meadia shills - and the networks they work for - continue to inject their positions, without justificaton from the Markets or the truly knowlegable economists?

Instead, just listen to Ron Paul talk about it all - in plain truth yet again. Unlike the typhoon of lies and propaganda put forth by the Congress, the MSM and the White House, he lays out the real deal of what's going on - despite how scarey and unpopular that may be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfvMTsKn_Bc&eurl=http://911trutheddie.blogspot.com/

The mainstream shills are going to continue to lie, but we've reached a point where they are so easily exposed. This bailout has incinerated many of them - fortunately. Perhaps we'll now start to get some REAL media coverage - but I doubt we're quite there yet.

Listen to George Bush's standard line of bull at : http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/10/10/bush.global.markets.cnn

Ron Paul: Bailout Bill "Unconstitutional"

Speaking immediately after today's catastrophic passing of the bailout bill in the House, Ron Paul said that - among other things - the bill was unconstitutional.

"This time the bill was much worse," Paul said. "It's amazing. You take a very very bad bill, you take it back out, and you make it much worse. It tells you a little bit about what's going on here in Washington.

"The one very bad part of this bill was the fact that the tax portion of this bill was written by the Senate, and under the Constitution, only the House can originate tax bills. So that in itself was unconstitutional.

"But it's been done before and it will be done again. But that's just sort of the way things happen around here."

Congressman Paul added that the bill doesn't deal with the problem, and that it was simply symbolic of our overspending and over extension - "the absolute bankruptcy of this country."

Watch Dr. Paul's comments on the left hand side of this blog under Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty Feed, or at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL-9CV-qbMw&eurl=http://911trutheddie.blogspot.com/.

In contrast, this morning's debate on the House floor saw Nancy Pelosi spewing lies, lauding over the House leaders on both sides for selling out their constituents, and celebrating that 57 members of Congress have no spine and switched their vote. Later in the afternoon, George Bush came out of his hole to tell us how much of a victory the vote was. Yeah, George, about as effective as a "Mission Accomplished."

And let's not forget that the "yay" side of this treason - in both the House and Senate - include the likes of Barack Obama, John McCain, Joe Biden, Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Jay Rockefeller (yes, David's nephew), John Boehner, Harry Reid, John Kerry, Joe Lieberman, Ted Stevens, and on and on and on with the most disgusting members of Congress.

Note: Dennis Kucinich kept his word - as always - and voted no.

It's Official: The General Public Gets Sold to the Robber Barrons

No surprise, the House backpeddaled earlier today and voted for the abhorrent bailout of the criminal Wall Street elite. By a 263-171 vote, our treasonous "representatives" slit our throats and transferred nearly a trillion dollars in debt from the books of the banks to the books of the government - in other words, your checkbook.

President Bush has already signed the bill into law, and now we can sit back and listen to the cable news shows tell us how great and necessary this was. I mean, the MSM can't even tell you the proper amount of this ridiculous bill. It's over $800 million after some adjustments, and they're still calling it $700 million! It's only way down in the article - if they say it at all - that they give the proper amount.

God help us.

Here is how the pandering scumbags voted:

ALABAMA
Democrats — Cramer, Y; Davis, Y

Republicans — Aderholt, N; Bachus, Y; Bonner, Y; Everett, Y; Rogers, Y

ALASKA
Republicans — Young, N.

ARIZONA
Democrats — Giffords, Y; Grijalva, N; Mitchell, Y; Pastor, Y.
Republicans — Flake, N; Franks, N; Renzi, N; Shadegg, Y

ARKANSAS
Democrats — Berry, Y; Ross, Y; Snyder, Y.
Republicans — Boozman, Y

CALIFORNIA
Democrats — Baca, Y; Becerra, N; Berman, Y; Capps, Y; Cardoza, Y; Costa, Y; Davis, Y; Eshoo, Y; Farr, Y; Filner, N; Harman, Y; Honda, Y; Lee, Y; Lofgren, Zoe, Y; Matsui, Y; McNerney, Y; Miller, George, Y; Napolitano, N; Pelosi, Y; Richardson, Y; Roybal-Allard, N; Sanchez, Linda T., N; Sanchez, Loretta, N; Schiff, Y; Sherman, N; Solis, Y; Speier, Y; Stark, N; Tauscher, Y; Thompson, Y; Waters, Y; Watson, Y; Waxman, Y; Woolsey, Y.

Republicans — Bilbray, N; Bono Mack, Y; Calvert, Y; Campbell, Y; Doolittle, N; Dreier, Y; Gallegly, N; Herger, Y; Hunter, N; Issa, N; Lewis, Y; Lungren, Daniel E., Y; McCarthy, N; McKeon, Y; Miller, Gary, Y; Nunes, N; Radanovich, Y; Rohrabacher, N; Royce, N

COLORADO
Democrats — DeGette, Y; Perlmutter, Y; Salazar, N; Udall, N.

Republicans — Lamborn, N; Musgrave, N; Tancredo, Y.

CONNECTICUT
Democrats — Courtney, N; DeLauro, Y; Larson, Y; Murphy, Y.

Republicans — Shays, Y.

DELAWARE
Republicans — Castle, Y.

FLORIDA
Democrats — Boyd, Y; Brown, Corrine, Y; Castor, N; Hastings, Y; Klein, Y; Mahoney, Y; Meek, Y; Wasserman Schultz, Y; Wexler, Y.

Republicans — Bilirakis, N; Brown-Waite, Ginny, N; Buchanan, Y; Crenshaw, Y; Diaz-Balart, L., N; Diaz-Balart, M., N; Feeney, N; Keller, N; Mack, N; Mica, N; Miller, N; Putnam, Y; Ros-Lehtinen, Y; Stearns, N; Weldon, Y; Young, N.

GEORGIA
Democrats — Barrow, N; Bishop, Y; Johnson, N; Lewis, Y; Marshall, Y; Scott, Y.

Republicans — Broun, N; Deal, N; Gingrey, N; Kingston, N; Linder, N; Price, N; Westmoreland, N.

HAWAII
Democrats — Abercrombie, Y; Hirono, Y.

IDAHO
Republicans — Sali, N; Simpson, Y.

ILLINOIS
Democrats — Bean, Y; Costello, N; Davis, Y; Emanuel, Y; Foster, Y; Gutierrez, Y; Hare, Y; Jackson, Y; Lipinski, N; Rush, Y; Schakowsky, Y.

Republicans — Biggert, Y; Johnson, N; Kirk, Y; LaHood, Y; Manzullo, N; Roskam, N; Shimkus, N; Weller, Y.

INDIANA
Democrats — Carson, Y; Donnelly, Y; Ellsworth, Y; Hill, N; Visclosky, N.

Republicans — Burton, N; Buyer, N; Pence, N; Souder, Y.

IOWA
Democrats — Boswell, Y; Braley, Y; Loebsack, Y.

Republicans — King, N; Latham, N.

KANSAS
Democrats — Boyda, N; Moore, Y.

Republicans — Moran, N; Tiahrt, N.

KENTUCKY
Democrats — Chandler, N; Yarmuth, Y.

Republicans — Davis, N; Lewis, Y; Rogers, Y; Whitfield, N.

LOUISIANA
Democrats — Cazayoux, N; Jefferson, N; Melancon, Y.

Republicans — Alexander, Y; Boustany, Y; McCrery, Y; Scalise, N.

MAINE
Democrats — Allen, Y; Michaud, N.

MARYLAND
Democrats — Cummings, Y; Edwards, Y; Hoyer, Y; Ruppersberger, Y; Sarbanes, Y; Van Hollen, Y.

Republicans — Bartlett, N; Gilchrest, Y.

MASSACHUSETTS
Democrats — Capuano, Y; Delahunt, N; Frank, Y; Lynch, N; Markey, Y; McGovern, Y; Neal, Y; Olver, Y; Tierney, Y; Tsongas, Y.

MICHIGAN
Democrats — Conyers, N; Dingell, Y; Kildee, Y; Kilpatrick, Y; Levin, Y; Stupak, N.

Republicans — Camp, Y; Ehlers, Y; Hoekstra, Y; Knollenberg, Y; McCotter, N; Miller, N; Rogers, N; Upton, Y; Walberg, N.

MINNESOTA
Democrats — Ellison, Y; McCollum, Y; Oberstar, Y; Peterson, N; Walz, N.

Republicans — Bachmann, N; Kline, Y; Ramstad, Y.

MISSISSIPPI
Democrats — Childers, N; Taylor, N; Thompson, N.

Republicans — Pickering, Y.

MISSOURI
Democrats — Carnahan, Y; Clay, N; Cleaver, Y; Skelton, Y.

Republicans — Akin, N; Blunt, Y; Emerson, Y; Graves, N; Hulshof, N.

MONTANA
Republicans — Rehberg, N.

NEBRASKA
Republicans — Fortenberry, N; Smith, N; Terry, Y.

NEVADA
Democrats — Berkley, Y.

Republicans — Heller, N; Porter, Y.

NEW HAMPSHIRE
Democrats — Hodes, N; Shea-Porter, N.

NEW JERSEY
Democrats — Andrews, Y; Holt, Y; Pallone, Y; Pascrell, Y; Payne, N; Rothman, N; Sires, Y.

Republicans — Ferguson, Y; Frelinghuysen, Y; Garrett, N; LoBiondo, N; Saxton, Y; Smith, N.

NEW MEXICO
Democrats — Udall, N.

Republicans — Pearce, N; Wilson, Y.

NEW YORK
Democrats — Ackerman, Y; Arcuri, Y; Bishop, Y; Clarke, Y; Crowley, Y; Engel, Y; Gillibrand, N; Hall, Y; Higgins, Y; Hinchey, N; Israel, Y; Lowey, Y; Maloney, Y; McCarthy, Y; McNulty, Y; Meeks, Y; Nadler, Y; Rangel, Y; Serrano, N; Slaughter, Y; Towns, Y; Velazquez, Y; Weiner, Y.

Republicans — Fossella, Y; King, Y; Kuhl, Y; McHugh, Y; Reynolds, Y; Walsh, Y.

NORTH CAROLINA
Democrats — Butterfield, N; Etheridge, Y; McIntyre, N; Miller, Y; Price, Y; Shuler, N; Watt, Y.

Republicans — Coble, Y; Foxx, N; Hayes, N; Jones, N; McHenry, N; Myrick, Y.

NORTH DAKOTA
Democrats — Pomeroy, Y.

OHIO
Democrats — Kaptur, N; Kucinich, N; Ryan, Y; Space, Y; Sutton, Y; Wilson, Y.

Republicans — Boehner, Y; Chabot, N; Hobson, Y; Jordan, N; LaTourette, N; Latta, N; Pryce, Y; Regula, Y; Schmidt, Y; Tiberi, Y; Turner, N.

OKLAHOMA
Democrats — Boren, Y.

Republicans — Cole, Y; Fallin, Y; Lucas, N; Sullivan, Y.

OREGON
Democrats — Blumenauer, N; DeFazio, N; Hooley, Y; Wu, Y.

Republicans — Walden, Y.

PENNSYLVANIA
Democrats — Altmire, N; Brady, Y; Carney, N; Doyle, Y; Fattah, Y; Holden, N; Kanjorski, Y; Murphy, Patrick, Y; Murtha, Y; Schwartz, Y; Sestak, Y.

Republicans — Dent, Y; English, N; Gerlach, Y; Murphy, Tim, N; Peterson, Y; Pitts, N; Platts, N; Shuster, Y.

RHODE ISLAND
Democrats — Kennedy, Y; Langevin, Y.

SOUTH CAROLINA
Democrats — Clyburn, Y; Spratt, Y.

Republicans — Barrett, Y; Brown, Y; Inglis, Y; Wilson, Y.

SOUTH DAKOTA
Democrats — Herseth Sandlin, N.

TENNESSEE
Democrats — Cohen, Y; Cooper, Y; Davis, Lincoln, N; Gordon, Y; Tanner, Y.

Republicans — Blackburn, N; Davis, David, N; Duncan, N; Wamp, Y.

TEXAS
Democrats — Cuellar, Y; Doggett, N; Edwards, Y; Gonzalez, Y; Green, Al, Y; Green, Gene, N; Hinojosa, Y; Jackson-Lee, Y; Johnson, E. B., Y; Lampson, N; Ortiz, Y; Reyes, Y; Rodriguez, N.

Republicans — Barton, N; Brady, Y; Burgess, N; Carter, N; Conaway, Y; Culberson, N; Gohmert, N; Granger, Y; Hall, N; Hensarling, N; Johnson, Sam, N; Marchant, N; McCaul, N; Neugebauer, N; Paul, N; Poe, N; Sessions, Y; Smith, Y; Thornberry, Y.

UTAH
Democrats — Matheson, N.

Republicans — Bishop, N; Cannon, Y.

VERMONT
Democrats — Welch, Y.

VIRGINIA
Democrats — Boucher, Y; Moran, Y; Scott, N.

Republicans — Cantor, Y; Davis, Tom, Y; Drake, N; Forbes, N; Goode, N; Goodlatte, N; Wittman, N; Wolf, Y.

WASHINGTON
Democrats — Baird, Y; Dicks, Y; Inslee, N; Larsen, Y; McDermott, N; Smith, Y.

Republicans — Hastings, N; McMorris Rodgers, N; Reichert, N.

WEST VIRGINIA
Democrats — Mollohan, Y; Rahall, Y.

Republicans — Capito, N.

WISCONSIN
Democrats — Baldwin, Y; Kagen, N; Kind, Y; Moore, Y; Obey, Y.

Republicans — Petri, N; Ryan, Y; Sensenbrenner, N.

WYOMING
Republicans — Cubin, Y.

Roll Call for Senate Bailout Vote

I guess it was too much to ask for two common sense votes in the same week.

After the House shot down the $700 billion golden parachute for the Wall Street crooks earlier this week, yesterday the Senate showed how pathetic it is in passing the bill by a whopping 74-25. This isn't overly surprising though. There are MAYBE a handful of admirable congresspeople, and they're basically ALL in the House.

As a New Jerseyan, I found it encouraging that a good number of N.J. Reps voted nay in the House. We went 0 for 2 in the Senate, however, in terms of doing the right thing.

The full bill can be viewed in PDF format at http://www.infowars.com/?p=5034.

Below is yesterday's roll call. And you can bet the House will be back tomorrow or very early next week to tilt a good number of its votes and send this to the Retard-in-Chief for the signoff, while he gives the nation that sub-moronic grin as he signs away more of our freedoms.

YEAs ---74

Akaka (D-HI), Alexander (R-TN), ,Baucus (D-MT), Bayh (D-IN), Bennett (R-UT), Biden (D-DE), Bingaman (D-NM), Bond (R-MO), Boxer (D-CA), Brown (D-OH), Burr (R-NC), Byrd (D-WV), Cardin (D-MD), Carper (D-DE), Casey (D-PA), Chambliss (R-GA), Clinton (D-NY), Coburn (R-OK), Coleman (R-MN), Collins (R-ME), Conrad (D-ND), Corker (R-TN), Cornyn (R-TX), Craig (R-ID), Dodd (D-CT), Domenici (R-NM), Durbin (D-IL), Ensign (R-NV), Feinstein (D-CA), Graham (R-SC), Grassley (R-IA), Gregg (R-NH), Hagel (R-NE), Harkin (D-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Hutchison (R-TX), Inouye (D-HI), Isakson (R-GA), Kerry (D-MA), Klobuchar (D-MN), Kohl (D-WI), Kyl (R-AZ), Lautenberg (D-NJ), Leahy (D-VT), Levin (D-MI), Lieberman (ID-CT), Lincoln (D-AR), Lugar (R-IN), Martinez (R-FL), McCain (R-AZ), McCaskill (D-MO), McConnell (R-KY), Menendez (D-NJ), Mikulski (D-MD), Murkowski (R-AK), Murray (D-WA), Nelson (D-NE), Obama (D-IL), Pryor (D-AR), Reed (D-RI), Reid (D-NV), Rockefeller (D-WV), Salazar (D-CO), Schumer (D-NY), Smith (R-OR), Snowe (R-ME), Specter (R-PA), Stevens (R-AK), Sununu (R-NH), Thune (R-SD), Voinovich (R-OH), Warner (R-VA), Webb (D-VA), Whitehouse (D-RI)

NAYs ---25

Allard (R-CO), Barrasso (R-WY), Brownback (R-KS), Bunning (R-KY), Cantwell (D-WA), Cochran (R-MS), Crapo (R-ID), DeMint (R-SC), Dole (R-NC), Dorgan (D-ND), Enzi (R-WY), Feingold (D-WI), Inhofe (R-OK), Johnson (D-SD), Landrieu (D-LA), Nelson (D-FL), Roberts (R-KS), Sanders (I-VT), Sessions (R-AL), Shelby (R-AL), Stabenow (D-MI), Tester (D-MT), Vitter (R-LA), Wicker (R-MS), Wyden (D-OR)

Beneath the Surface of the Bailout Charade

Has there EVER been a more blatant example of the Dems and GOP being both sides of the same coin than this week's bailout issue? Probably not.

Now, yes, a greater percentage of Republicans were against yesterday's bailout vote. However, if you look at the top tiers in each party and the public rhetoric they've been spewing, you'll see little difference. On the proponent side, you'll find Dems like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, and Barack Obama. The GOP supporters boast John Boehner, Tom Tancredo, John McCain, and yes, our fearless leader, George W. Bush. Take a look at this cross-section; it comprises both parts of the Legislative as well as the Executive branch. As I and thousands of other "alternative" bloggers and alternative media folks continue to contend - there's NO difference.

When Congress resumes on Thursday, I'm sure they'll pass this bailout. If not, they'll have it by some time this weekend. There is simply going to be too much pressure from the crooks on Wall Street to sway the less than twenty votes they need. But why? Because the media shills continue to lie and promote the globalist agenda? YES - for one thing.

Over the past couple of days, we've been subjected to such inane comments from the cable news folks as, 'the GOP has abandoned John McCain.'

Sure.

How about the fact that a good percentage of the GOP is backing off McCain, knows the perception is he's aligned with Bush, and knows that's suicide. Also, there's the contingent of Ron Paul Republicans (1.2 million strong in the GOP primaries) who under no circumstances will vote for McCain. Don't think for a second that the Republicans up for re-election don't know that.

In an interview yesterday just after the bailout bill's failure, Congressman Paul said that an overwhemling amount of emails from constituants opposing the debate had a lot to do with the outcome. Whether or not he's right, one would certainly hope so. It would mean more and more of the public is waking up to the crimes and games of the global central banks and the New World Order.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0xOwHa2zls

"It was different than anything i've experienced before," Paul said. "When they announced the vote, it was dead silence. It really shook up a lot of people. This is serious stuff."

Personally, I can't seem to get past how people can be so dumb as to not pick up on the activity of the fraudulent stock market. It doesn't own a dime, and the money is all with the corrupt corporations. It's a charade. However, despite the fact that NOTHING has changed in terms of policy or economic standing from one day to the next, the DJIA went from a 777-point drop to a 486-point gain in one day to the next?

After the bailout's defeat, Ron Paul was also quoted as saying, "the markets are down... but it's not really that drastic. We've seen days like that frequently. So it wasn't like the markets depended on this appropriation. My argument has been that if we voted for the money, the money and the market would get much worse."

This will be approved one way or the other. Frankly, I'm split. Not on the bailout, but on the initial effects and reactions.

One the one hand, I would love to see the Bernanke-loving yuppies lose everything they have. In the end, though, people like myself who have to come up with creative ways to pay the rent each month will be in the same boat as these smug morons.

Personally speaking, I work in a building in Midtown Manhattan with a number of these idiots - male and female. I see first-hand that because they and their spouses both make $90,000 a year that they think they're part of the establishement. And every time I have a two-minute elevator ride with one of them I force myself to keep my mouth shut.

At the end of the day, I can console myself because of one thing; I haven't - nor ever have had - a pot to piss in. They, on the other hand, have decided to dump money in various "retirement" accounts they will never see. They have carpet-bagged into this Metro-NY area and think they are in some way part of the globalist decision-making process. HA!

It will hurt us all the same in the end, but I'm glad that at least I know what's up.

Dubya, Meet the Good Dr.

Below is yet another outstanding statement from Congressman Ron Paul. How is this guy not the GOP candidate for President?

This time he takes aim at the Moron-in-Chief and his asinine economic address from last night.

My Answer to the President

The financial meltdown the economists of the Austrian School predicted has arrived.

We are in this crisis because of an excess of artificially created credit at the hands of the Federal Reserve System. The solution being proposed? More artificial credit by the Federal Reserve. No liquidation of bad debt and malinvestment is to be allowed. By doing more of the same, we will only continue and intensify the distortions in our economy - all the capital misallocation, all the malinvestment - and prevent the market's attempt to re-establish rational pricing of houses and other assets. Last night the president addressed the nation about the financial crisis. There is no point in going through his remarks line by line, since I'd only be repeating what I've been saying over and over - not just for the past several days, but for years and even decades. Still, at least a few observations are necessary.

The president assures us that his administration "is working with Congress to address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets." Care to take a guess at whether the Federal Reserve and its money creation spree were even mentioned?

We are told that "low interest rates" led to excessive borrowing, but we are not told how these low interest rates came about. They were a deliberate policy of the Federal Reserve. As always, artificially low interest rates distort the market. Entrepreneurs engage in malinvestments - investments that do not make sense in light of current resource availability, that occur in more temporally remote stages of the capital structure than the pattern of consumer demand can support, and that would not have been made at all if the interest rate had been permitted to tell the truth instead of being toyed with by the Fed. Not a word about any of that, of course, because Americans might then discover how the great wise men in Washington caused this great debacle. Better to keep scapegoating the mortgage industry or "wildcat capitalism" (as if we actually have a pure free market!).

Speaking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the president said: "Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk."

Doesn't that prove the foolishness of chartering Fannie and Freddie in the first place? Doesn't that suggest that maybe, just maybe, government may have contributed to this mess? And of course, by bailing out Fannie and Freddie, hasn't the federal government shown that the "many" who "believed they were guaranteed by the federal government" were in fact correct?

Then come the scare tactics. If we don't give dictatorial powers to the Treasury Secretary "the stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet." Left unsaid, naturally, is that with the bailout and all the money and credit that must be produced out of thin air to fund it, the value of your retirement account will drop anyway, because the value of the dollar will suffer a precipitous decline. As for home prices, they are obviously much too high, and supply and demand cannot equilibrate if government insists on propping them up. It's the same destructive strategy that government tried during the Great Depression: prop up prices at all costs. The Depression went on for over a decade. On the other hand, when liquidation was allowed to occur in the equally devastating downturn of 1921, the economy recovered within less than a year.

The president also tells us that Senators McCain and Obama will join him at the White House today in order to figure out how to get the bipartisan bailout passed. The two senators would do their country much more good if they stayed on the campaign trail debating who the bigger celebrity is, or whatever it is that occupies their attention these days.

F.A. Hayek won the Nobel Prize for showing how central banks' manipulation of interest rates creates the boom-bust cycle with which we are sadly familiar. In 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression, he described the foolish policies being pursued in his day - and which are being proposed, just as destructively, in our own.

Instead of furthering the inevitable liquidation of the maladjustments brought about by the boom during the last three years, all conceivable means have been used to prevent that readjustment from taking place; and one of these means, which has been repeatedly tried though without success, from the earliest to the most recent stages of depression, has been this deliberate policy of credit expansion.

To combat the depression by a forced credit expansion is to attempt to cure the evil by the very means which brought it about; because we are suffering from a misdirection of production, we want to create further misdirection - a procedure that can only lead to a much more severe crisis as soon as the credit expansion comes to an end... It is probably to this experiment, together with the attempts to prevent liquidation once the crisis had come, that we owe the exceptional severity and duration of the depression. The only thing we learn from history, I am afraid, is that we do not learn from history.

The very people who have spent the past several years assuring us that the economy is fundamentally sound, and who themselves foolishly cheered the extension of all these novel kinds of mortgages, are the ones who now claim to be the experts who will restore prosperity! Just how spectacularly wrong, how utterly without a clue, does someone have to be before his expert status is called into question? Oh, and did you notice that the bailout is now being called a "rescue plan"? I guess "bailout" wasn't sitting too well with the American people.

The very people who with somber faces tell us of their deep concern for the spread of democracy around the world are the ones most insistent on forcing a bill through Congress that the American people overwhelmingly oppose. The very fact that some of you seem to think you're supposed to have a voice in all this actually seems to annoy them.

I continue to urge you to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind. I myself am doing everything I can to promote the correct point of view on the crisis. Be sure also to educate yourselves on these subjects - the Campaign for Liberty blog is an excellent place to start. Read the posts, ask questions in the comment section, and learn. H.G. Wells once said that civilization was in a race between education and catastrophe. Let us learn the truth and spread it as far and wide as our circumstances allow. For the truth is the greatest weapon we have.

In liberty,

Ron Paul

New Ludicrous bin Laden News, but Who's Paying Attention?

Once again, we recently had an autumn appearance of an Osama bin Laden video. Why is it that every Fall we have to be subjected to this bull? Maybe because elections are coming?? No different than any of the past government propaganda, the content was without fact, moronic, and meaningless. Unlike in the past, however, there was virtually no public response, and a stunning lack of sheeple running around in terror.

George Bush has called for the delivery of bin Laden by November - or else! Unfortunately for the criminals in power, there is an economic depression going on, and nobody cares. Unless the powers that be trot out Osama's corpse at some point in the next six weeks, I'm pretty certain this is the last time we're going to be subjected to doctored boogeyman tapes - with this particular bad man that is.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5841873&page=1

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94575902

Yes, the general public is still a pack of idiots, and yes, they watch Fox News, and yes, Fox News is full of trash that continue to contend that we were attacked on 9/11 by Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. The public though is way too mesmerized these days by other fakery - like the differences between Obama and McCain, and how the Fed is going to rescue us from economic disaster - to even care about Orwellian-style created enemies.

Let's not forget that despite all of this nonsense, bin Laden probably hasn't been alive for years anyway. In fact, I completely believe he's dead, and the only way they're going to produce his body is if they've had him frozen somewhere for the past seven years.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2008/020708Laden.htm

News flash to the criminals: Come up with a new boogeyman! No one is buying this bull anymore.

Ron Paul Rally Rocks Minneapolis!

The surge of energy, patriotism, and solidarity at the Target Center last night was something I personally have never seen in 31 years on this planet. Sure, there have been larger gatherings, and perhaps even higher decibel levels (perhaps), but never the combination of numbers, noise, and a genuine message - free of corporate sponsorship - all at the same time.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Conventions/story?id=5709014&page=1

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1003046/rnc_snorefest_drives_journalists_to.html?cat=8

The Rally for the Republic was an enormous success, and featured not only a speech for the ages by Congressman Paul, but some really dazzling words and performances - including a few huge surprises. C-SPAN 2 - aside from cutting away during the Aimee Allen performance for some ridiculous RNC coverage - did a great job covering the entire day and night.

Dr. Paul himself had the crowd of some 10,000-15,000 supporters in an hour-long frenzy. He gave a fiery sermon about liberties, freedom, the ill-advised direction the Neo-Cons have steered us in, and he even had some scathing remarks about the War on Drugs. I have never seen such admiration, adoration, and excitement from so many people about a candidate the media didn't tell them to support. It was real, and it was exhilarating to watch.

There were a number of memorable quotes from Dr. Paul, but rather than blandly run them down here, I suggest going over to the C-SPAN website where you can watch the speech in its entirety.

http://www.c-span.org/

There were a number of memorable appearances that truly came out of nowhere. First off, I though MSNBC's Tucker Carlson did a great job mc'ing. I've always thought of him - especially during his CNN Crossfire days - as a little Neo-Con minion. I must say, however, he seemed genuine enough about his admiration towards Dr. Paul, as well as his support of Libertarian ideals.

Barry Goldwater, Jr. introduced the Congressman, and really got the crowed fired up. I honestly must say I didn't expect all that much from him, especially after Alex Jones had expressed a rather 'so what' attitude toward Goldwater's attendance.

The biggest and brightest surprise to me though was the speech given by U.S. Olympic Gold Medal swimmer Erik Vendt. He really got the crowd going, describing how during his China trip he thought how he's glad he didn't live in a country where they listen to phone calls, read emails, and have cabs bugged.

"Then I realized," he said, "they (the U.S. Government) read my emails and listen to my phone calls.

"We're just one terror attack away from Martial Law."

What was not a surprise was Jesse Ventura's dead-on speech attacking the Bush Administration, the corporate run media, and the general direction of the country. He also came through big time with a little 9/11 Truth action.

"I'm going to move on to another subject that a lot of people don't want to discuss today," Ventura said. "And that's something called 9/11."

Ventura later went on to say, "When the FBI was pressed as to why 9/11 wasn't included [in Osama bin-Laden's rap sheet], their response was 'we don't have enough evidence'."

"Why do we have a President who stonewalled any investigation into 9/11 for two years?"

Good old Governor Ventura. Telling it like it is. What was really encouraging however, was that he sounded a lot more energized and upbeat than he did a few weeks ago on the Alex Jones Show when he sounded pretty resigned as to the fate of the U.S.

After last week's nauseating dog and pony show at the DNC, and the basically non-existent Neo-Con parade full of unpopular discredited fools in St. Paul at the RNC, last night's Rally was really the potent shot in the arm of patriotism that the people needed. It showed yet again that there really is an interest in freedom and in our Constitution, and that there are powerful, courageous people still out there willing to lead the Revolution.

Further Evidence Barack is the Chosen One

As if it weren't already blatantly evident that Barack Obama is the heir to the throne, the RNC announced some bizarre and certainly non-constructive highlights to the Sept. 1 - 4 convention.

President Bush will speak on the opening night of the convention, and even more ludicrous is the fact that the keynote speech of the entire four days will be given by none other than the abject failure candidate, Rudy Giuliani.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/20/rnc.lineup/

The spinsters say the logic here is to show "diversity" within the party, and to cover a number of different "stronghold" states between the various players. Still, there's no escaping the pure truth; no one likes Bush or Giuliani - regardless of their diverse views or geographic popularity contrasts.

The President's approval rating has been hovering between 25 and 30 percent for eons now. Giuliani was just a year ago the darling prince of the GOP, and the "front runner." However, when the primaries began and it was time to put up or shut up, he fell faster than a lead balloon. He spent eight-figure money on a very abridged campaign that garnered exactly zero delegates.

Additional trouble seems to be looming in that the ultra-right Christian gang detest Rudy, and John McCain's credibility with that clan is already deeply in question. Not sure how Rudy's presence - keynoting no less - is going to help there. Of course Dubbya is not exactly the glue to hold things together. With a (generous) approval rating of 30 percent in a country with so many radical Christian Neo-Cons, he certainly isn't going to solidify much support either.

Obviously the GOP doesn't have a whole lot to work with, and in the end it really makes no difference whether Obama or McCain wins. It just means we'll know up front rather than down the line that the voters have made a grave mistake. But trotting out fake Liberal, "Independent" Joe Lieberman to champion for McCain, and featuring George and Rudy just smacks too much of a complete and total phoning in of the upcoming election.

Neo-Con Hubris Reaches New Heights

Now that it's all but admitted that factions of the U.S. Government are behind Georgia's attacks against Russian military bases and civilians in the provinces of Ossetia and Abkhazia, it's apparent the Neo-Cons are more reckless than ever, and are going to leave one heck of a mark before departing in January.

Media across the world (aside from the corporate-owned media in the U.S. and England) are reporting that at least two black mercenary soldiers with American flags festooned on black uniforms have been found dead, and one black merc with American regalia has been captured along with Georgian aggressors.

www.infowars.com/?p=3871

http://www.prisonplanet.com/civilian-genocide-dead-americans-cost-of-us-russia-proxy-war.html

http://www.prisonplanet.com/american-mercenary-captured-by-russians.html

It's bad enough that the U.S. is using Georgia as a proxy to attack Russia, but how much bolder could they be than sending in black guys, likely employed by Blackwater (given the black uniforms) with American flags on their Darth Vader uniforms. It couldn't possibly get more blatantly arrogant. The media makes it even worse by acting as if Russia is the evildoer here.

http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2008/08/11/2904/russias_attacks_reviving_cold_war_worries

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hV2N6fVKS5slf10A13Dj_uIdaZ4QD92FDSLG0

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/33836.html

Of course, the Neo-Cons have probably calculated well enough that the overwhelming majority of American sheeple will not even know this is going on - given the fact the Olympics are in full-swing, and John Edwards may have a love child. Double insurance probably rests on the fact that most Americans who have heard this story probably think that Russia has attacked the southern U.S. state of Georgia to, as Alex Jones said yesterday, "get our peaches."

It's not as if we can rely on the MSM to accurately or fairly report any of this. After all, we just had Dick Cheney recently accused of planning the next 9/11, and it was nowhere to be found on U.S. news.

As we speak, Russia is steamrolling Georgia, and at any moment could destroy them if they wanted to. Of course, if they were to dare bombard Georgia in retaliation, they would be called terrorist aggressors, and condemned - at the very least - by the U.S. and the West. More likely, a forceful Russian response would be met by further hardcore actions by the NATO forces, and a complete escalation. Russia would then naturally be labeled as in league with al-Qaeda - in the same vain that Iran would be labeled terrorists if Israel bombed them to hell and back, and had the audacity to fight back and protect themselves.

Speaking of Iran, it's all too convenient that the U.S. is stirring the pot in the former Soviet region as it steps up its plans for an attack against Iran. More U.S. forces are being moved into waters off of Iran as we speak.

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5499

The Russians, of course, have warned the U.S. from some time now that an attack on Iran would not be met lightly. What better way to divert attention than to have the Russians caught up in their own mess?

For those who don't think we're backing Georgia - just look it up; but for a quick figure - Georgia has had the third largest military presence in Iraq (some 3000 troops). They have now pulled those troops out to fight this new proxy war, but they have certainly been our lapdogs for a long time.

Not to be lost in all of this are the calls for Russia to stop the violence (remember, they were attacked first) by our President, and the two morons running to take his spot. McCain was quoted this morning as saying, "Russian President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin must understand the severe, long-term negative consequences that their government’s actions will have for Russia’s relationship with the U.S. and Europe."

Bush and Cheney have also made their tough-guy stances, warning Russia to back off - complete insanity considering they're behind it all!

If this whole situation was not such a dark harbinger, the Neo-Con statements would be up for jokes of the month.

"Terrorist" Limo Driver Convicted of "War Crimes"

A jury of six at Guantanamo Bay yesterday found Salim Hamdan guilty of war crimes and aiding terrorists. Hamdan was Osama Bin-Laden's limo driver. That's it. A guy who drove a billionaire around. No different than the driver for Paris Hilton, Michael Jordan, or Barack Obama for that matter.

This is nothing more than a side show aimed at fooling the public into thinking our government is being tough on terror. It gives the good ole boys and yuppies a sense of false security, so maybe they won't have to shine a flashlight into their bushes and make sure there are no bearded guys skulking after dark tonight.

Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the so-called 9/11 Mastermind, even once said that Hamdan was a mere chauffeur.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3794

But, hey, it's not like they can prosecute any active al-CIA-da operatives. That would, after all, be the government indicting its own minions. No bother, the media shills will still hail this as a major victory in the war on terror. I mean, just days ago, they reported that Abu Khabab al-Masri, al-Qaeda's top weapons expert, died for the second time. Obviously, the MSM knows the retarded public isn't paying any real attention, and even if they think some might be, they simply don't care.

http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=11076

Then again, I can't even blame the general public if they aren't keeping track. It's like trying to solve some AP Calculus problem. We have the #3 in al-Qaeda killed four times, the #4 man killed twice, the #2 killed three times, and on and on and on.

The only bit of truth throughout this whole charade was a couple of weeks back when a Naval prosecutor slipped-up and admitted out loud that the Air Force blew Flight 93 to kingdom come on 9/11.

Want to talk war crimes? How about Bush, Cheney, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld and the MSM lying to the country and luring more than 4200 U.S. solidiers to their deaths in Iraq because Saddam Hussein had WMDs and was complicit in 9/11.