Thursday, December 11, 2008

Ron Paul Keeps His Foot on the Throat on The Federal Reserve

Once again our spineless and criminal House of "Representatives" has voted to float billions of dollars to a bunch of robber barons - at the expense of an American public that increasingly cannot afford to eat, pay rent, buy medicines, and have some level of base entertainment all in the same month.

By a vote of 237-170, the House voted last night to approve $14 billion to rescue the archaic U.S. auto industry in what promises to be the Wall Street bailout on a smaller scale - enough money to artificially inflate the markets, keep the public from devolving into chaos, and pay the corporate executives millions in year-end bonuses.

As always, Congressman Ron Paul was front and center during the House bailout debate to buck the puppet line and refresh everyone as to the true root of our current economic Armageddon.

“If you look at the grand problem we have it’s much much bigger,” said Paul. "We spend more money, we run up more debt, we print more money, and we think that’s going to solve the problem that was created by spending too much money, running up debt, printing too much money and here we are today.

“[The Federal Reserve] create[s] this money and when the Fed chairman comes before our committee we ask, 'where did you dispose of this $2 trillion dollars that you’ve created recently,' he says 'well it’s not your business;' he doesn’t even have to tell us.”

Dr. Paul also added that the creation of over $8 trillion dollars in government obligations by the Federal Reserve evaded the audit of Congress - which, incidentally, is completely unconstitutional.

Back in September, Congressman Paul stated that Bernanke and former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan - among others - should be brought up on criminal charges for their part in the destruction of the U.S. economy.

The issue and vote is now with the Senate - where you can be assured that the even more corrupt half of the Legislature will send the money through without a hitch.

The bottom line is this: until the public wakes up to how our monetary system really works, and until we have more Ron Pauls in Congress, more and more Fortune 1000 crooks are going to be cashing in on the dimes of the average struggling American.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Gul "a Terrorist" for Taliban Connection... or Truth About 9/11?

The United States reportedly has plans to label former Pakistani ISI Chief Hamid Gul as a terrorist. The official line of bull is that Gul is under suspicion of providing political and moral support to the Taliban-led resistance in Afghanistan. More likely, however, he solidified his place on the long list of supposed terrorists with his recent claims that both 9/11 and the Mumbai attacks were inside jobs.

Gul told members of the international press, “The U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That’s $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don’t believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves.”

Regarding Pakistan, he said, "The destabilization of Pakistan is part of the U.S. plan because it is a Muslim nuclear state. The U.S. wants to isolate Pakistan from China as part of its containment policy."

Interesting how the comments and the terror label dovetail so smoothly.

What's even more curious, perhaps, is that another former ISI head, Mahmood Ahmed, escapes the terrorist list despite having clearly been linked to alleged hijacker Mohamed Atta and the 9/11 attacks.

Ahmed was in Washington on the morning of 9/11 meeting with top intelligence and political officials, and in the days following the attacks met with VP-elect and Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair Joe Biden.

The difference between Ahmed and Gul is simple. One helps to perpetuate the corrupt, evil agenda of the rogue government, while the other sees right through its arrogant and ever-unraveling campaign of terror.

Israel Looks to Ride the Coattails of More Staged Terror

Aside from the Neo-Cons and the police state they were afforded after the false-flag attacks of 9/11, there's no question Israel was the number one beneficiary of the carnage in New York and Washington. The attacks were a big old green light to wage illegal and endless war on the Muslim world - i.e. - enemies of the Israeli state - through its proxy strong arm, the United States.

The Mumbai attacks late last month that killed some 180 people are shaping up to be just the latest excuse for Israel to stir up anti-Islamic sentiment across the globe and manipulate the U.S. and any other willing party into aggressively advancing on its so called enemies.

According to the DEBKAfile military intelligence website, Israel is volunteering to help India in a military campaign against selected targets in Pakistan as retaliation for last months attacks. Of course, Pakistan has never threatened Israel, is not in the Middle East, and there is no evidence that the Pakistani government had any involvement in the attacks. Rather, there are Western and Israeli paw prints all over the smoking gun.

Why bother with evidence though, right? With the Middle-East obsessed Neo-Cons' time just about up and Israel's lobby for the U.S. to annihilate Iran falling flat, the Israelis - as well as the rogue elements of the U.S. and British governments - need new blood. Honing in on Pakistan works for everyone. For Israel, it gives them a Muslim target of hatred and bullying. Enough said. For the Western contingent, it moves the chess pieces that much closer to what is sure to be the apple of the Obama administration's eye - Russia.

Unlike the amateur chaos in the Middle East, however, stirring trouble in Central Asia is creating an enormous powder keg with the potential for worldwide destruction. India and Pakistan are already arch enemies with a long history of military conflict. In contrast to, say, Iraq and Iran, they are extremely well armed with the highest nuclear capabilities. These are not rag-tag third world nations that the U.S. and Israel can paste fake bearded bogeymen on - causing widespread panic and terror - knowing no real threat to global well-being exists.

With Israeli spy and rabid Zionist Rahm Emmanual as the incoming White House Chief of Staff, along with endless predictions of disaster shortly after Obama's inauguration, the recent troubles in Central Asia are that much more frightening.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

"Change" We've Been - and Will Be - Haunted By

In either the days before or right after Barack Obama's election victory, I recall of one his public relation hacks running around the cable "news" shows proclaiming that his administration would not be comprised of "retreads." I'm still trying to find the exact quote(s), but in the meantime, the sickening and endless proclamations of "change" are plenty proof positive that this is all a colossal hoax.

There is no question that any incoming president needs a strong, experienced supporting cast. I have no issue at all with the selection of Joe Biden as Vice President. I did think that Hillary Clinton - especially considering the covert meeting with her and Barack at the 2008 Bilderberg gathering - was undoubtedly the selection here, but Biden is certainly a viable choice. And for that matter, Hillary is strong pick for Secretary of State.

And as more of the upcoming administration plays itself out, it becomes clearer exactly why Hillary so easily gave up VP for State Department. I've written before I thought there was no way. Evidently there was some wheeling and dealing however in the form of a strong trade off, as this is rapidly becoming the third Clinton administration.

As for some of Obama's other new minions of "change," there's no better place to start than with the hated Neo-Cons.

Robert Gates has been tabbed to stay on as Defense Secretary. But how can you argue with this? Keep the appointee of a a Neo-Con administration that is perhaps the least popular in U.S. history and has orchestrated two completely disastrous wars. Yes, he's probably not as bad as Rumsfeld, and that's exactly the key point. He helps retain a certain modicum of anti-Muslim, Middle East crusade rhetoric under a guise of lesser of evils.

The 'You Absolutely Must Be Joking' award of Obama's appointments can gp to none other than the appointment of Tim Geitner - New York Federal Reserve head - as Treasury Secretary. It's not enough that almost all of our current economic problems stem from the fact that we have a [Non] Federal [with absolutely no] Reserve[s]. Let's go and appoint the governor of its biggest branch to be our next Henry Paulson. Geitner is also a disciple of former Clintonians Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers.

Following closely behind Geitner is good old Larry Summers himself - elitist Harvard bigwig and former Treasury Secretary under Clinton.

Former Federal Reserve chair Paul Volcker - who during the Carter regime helped to completely dismantle the economy - is right there, too, as chief economic advisor.

Tom Daschele gets the nod as Secretary of Health and Human Services. The former South Dakota senator is admittedly a mixed bag. On the one hand, he was one of the targets of the infamous government-run anthrax attacks of late 2001, no doubt signaling he was out of favor with the elite. However, there are sickening aspects to his resume. Not the least of which are his 2006 endorsement of warrantless spying, and the fact that his wife, Linda Hall, is a top Washington lobbyist - and was acting administrator of the FAA during the Clinton years.

Finally, and perhaps most notorious, is Chief of Staff nominee Rahm Emanuel - who happens to be Obama's first appointment of any kind. A former Clinton White House advisor, he is nothing but an Israeli loyalist, anti-Islamic thug of the worst variety. It sickens me to even think or write about him or his father, Benjamin. Just google them.

The web is weaved even far more intricately, but I frankly don't have the stomach to go on. Research it for yourself.

This isn't change, it's a reunion. All cleverly masked by horrifyingly messianic-like support from the world, and absolutely no consideration for facts.

Utter the word change - as long as you don't look like the previous 43 presidents - and there can be no doubt that you in fact stand for change.