Could "Bailout" Be Code for "World War III"?

According to Paul Watson at Prison Planet, Chinese mainstream news outlets today reported that the RAND Corporation recently presented a proposal to the Pentagon in which it lobbied for war with a major foreign power in an attempt to stimulate the American economy. This on the heels of recent proclamations from Joe Biden, Colin Powell, Michael Chertoff, and others that Barack Obama will face a major crisis immediately after taking office, as well as the U.S.-Israeli sneak attack on Russia through Georgia back in August.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/rand-lobbies-pentagon-start-war-to-save-us-economy.html

Allegedly these foreign media sources - there was a French language report as well - are claiming that RAND suggested the $700 billion dollars that has been earmarked to bailout the Wall Street crooks be used instead to finance a new war - thereby reinvigorating the U.S. markets and economy.

Among the nations considered possible U.S. targets: China, Russia, Iran and even Japan. This is very disturbing when taken in combination with the recent fear mongering about a post-inauguration crisis. Don't forget, Russia-obsessed maniac Zbigniew Brzezinski is always lurking in the shadows of the Obama camp, and the shift from the Neo-Con Middle East focus to a Central Asia/Eurasia/Asia Proper campaign is already quite evident.

http://911trutheddie.blogspot.com/2008/10/talibanal-qaeda-split-ominous-sign-for.html

Paul Watson also pointed out that the RAND corporation has deep ties to the U.S. military-industrial complex as well as connections with the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations. Current directors of RAND include Frank Charles Carlucci III, former Defense Secretary and Deputy Director of the CIA, Ronald L. Olson, Council on Foreign Relations member and former Secretary of Labor, and Carl Bildt, top Bilderberg member and former Swedish Prime Minister.

That's some pretty upstanding company, huh?

Notable as well is that as of late this afternoon, there was no English-speaking media story or broadcast about these developments. No surprise there.

Who knows at this point what's going on here, but it's certainly pretty damn scary. Rest assured Prison Planet will be keeping a close eye on any developments.

Taliban/al-Qaeda "Split." Ominous Sign for Pakistan?

Sources today are reporting that there are on going talks between the Taliban, and the regimes of Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan - aimed at ending conflict in Central Asia and allegedly signaling a severing of ties between the Taliban and al-CIA-da.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/10/06/afghan.saudi.talks/index.html

Well, that sounds all warm and fuzzy, but give us a break. The Saudis, the Afghans, and al-Qaeda (such as it exists) are all pawns of U.S. Intelligence and the global elite. They'll do what they're told, when they're told and how they're told - as decided on by the Bilderbergers.

What's really going on here is a quiet but shrewdly calculated shift away from the Middle East and on to Central Asia as a focus of gremlin enemies. It manipulates Pakistan into the crosshairs, and more importantly, it's an huge step closer to conflict with Russia and China.

With Barack Obama seemingly a lock to be the next President, it only stands to reason that the government and the media begin to turn the public's attention and anxieties to this region of the world. Obama's foreign policy guru, Zbigniew Brzezinski, is ever lurking in the shadows, and he's spent the past 40 or so years obsessing over how to annihilate all members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. See his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/int/sco.htm

http://www.takeoverworld.info/grandchessboard.html

Last August, it was Obama who declared that he is ready and willing to attack Pakistan in the name of fighting al-Qaeda.

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0132206420070801

Iraq and Iran are largely Neo-Con agendas. They'll do if need be under an Obama regime, but the Leftist eyes are definitely on bigger fish. With Dick Cheney unable to carry out false flag terror earlier this year, aimed at launching an attack on Iran, the Neo-Con war aspirations have all but fizzled out unless John McCain somehow wins next month.

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/31/cheney-proposal-for-iran-war/

Look for less and less about Iran and more and more about Pakistan as we get nearer to the Obama coup.

Thousands of Ignorant Hypocrites Gather Outside the U.N.

Thousands showed up outside the U.N. today to protest an appearance in front of the global criminals by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in a complete parade of hypocrisy dubbed a Stop Iran rally.

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/united.nations.general.2.822871.html

The pro-Israel carnival had all its bases covered, with sheeple of every age, race, and color, endless banners and signs spouting lies, and trotting out author and Holocaust survivor Eli Weisel. This of course means that if you criticize today's rally, you're anti-Semetic, a holocaust denier, and whatever else. Well, I am neither of the aforementioned, but you'd better believe I found this protest comical and disgraceful at the same time.

"The proper place of Iran's pres, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is not in the UN, not at university events, not at social or diplomatic dinners," author and Holocaust survivor Eli Weisel said. "His place is before a international tribunal who would try him for crimes against humanity."

What crimes against humanity, exactly? Clearly Iran's front man is nuts, and certainly isn't up for any peace prizes, but I don't recall his ever have engaged in anything nearly as criminal as what goes on publicly at the hands of the Israeli military in Gaza and the West Bank, and covertly around the world by the Mossad.

There were plenty of Muslim-hating morons out this morning spouting lies and propaganda about Ahmadinejad wanting to wipe Israel off the earth, and wanting another holocaust, and on and on. Then there was this:

Yossi Kahan said. "Disgusting Americans let tyrants come to [this country]."

That is true, but that certainly includes any number of Israeli government figures that have set foot on our soil.

As always, the center focus was on Iran's nuclear ambitions. How can these pro-Israel types demand Iran not develop weapons to protect itself, when Israel has hundreds of nukes and never hesitates to threaten other sovereign nations - including Iran. Having the mainstream media continually prop up Israel as good and Iran as evil, however, does nothing to help enlighten folks to what's actually going on.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/06/06/israel.iran/index.html

The latest creation of the criminal corporate media had some astoundingly belligerent words as well. Sarah "Wicked Witch of the Northwest" Palin said in a prepared statement: [Ahmadinejad is a madman with] "an agenda that threatens all who seek a safer and freer world. We gather here today to highlight the Iranian dictator's intentions and to call for action to thwart him. He must be stopped."

Now go ask Ms. Palin if she can find Iran on a map.

Arab Neighbors Issue Bizzare, Frightening Warning to Iran

Over the weekend, Egypt and Saudi Arabia warned Iran not to allow the U.S. and Israel to stage a provocation as a pretext for a strike against Tehran. On one hand, it's certainly ominous that the rest of the world - outside of the U.S. and British media - knows and is reporting that the Zionists and the rogues atop the U.S. Government are gearing up to annihilate Iran. At the same time, what do they want the Iranians to do?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/iran-warned-not-to-allow-war-pretext.html

Iran has time and again said that while they will not hesitate to defend themselves, they certainly aren't looking for a fight with the U.S. and Israel. They've allowed weapons inspections. They've looked the other way when the U.S. has backed Sunni al-Qaeda rebels to stage bombings inside of Iran.

http://www.democracynow.org/2007/2/28/investigative_reporter_seymour_hersh_us_indirectly

Aside from all of this, what do Cairo and Riyadh expect from Iran? If the true axis-of-evil - U.S., Israel, Britain - decide tomorrow they want to stage a pretext, it's done. End of story. They already masterfully pulled off 9/11, the 7/7 London bombings, the attack on U.S.S. Liberty, and on and on. That said, I have no idea what the Egyptians and Saudis are driving at here.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/omicinski/081.htm

It is interesting to note that in addition to a number of European and Central Asian countries, it was countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia that tried to warn the U.S. in the weeks and months before 9/11 that an attack was imminent. The only problem was, they were warning the attackers themselves. Now, they're essentially warning the Iranians - though it's certainly not a secret to anyone let alone Iran - that an attack is very likely, very soon. Just last week the U.S. rounded out its largest naval deployment in nearly two decades, as they now have five warships in the Persian Gulf region.

Of course there was also last month's revelation from Sy Hersh that Dick Cheney had as many as a dozen different scenarios for a provocateur event to blame on Iran. He detailed only one, which was ultimately rejected.

Could one of the other 11 or so be the event the Egyptians and Saudis are warning against, and that Iran will be powerless to stop?

Candidates' Threats, Criticisms of Russia a Complete Joke

John McCain and Barack Obama have been running around all week condemning Russia for daring to fight back against Georgia, and making veiled threats if Russia does not call off the dogs.

This is absurd. Either a) these buffoons really have no idea that Georgia attacked Russia unprovoked to start this whole mess - backed by U.S., Israeli, and NATO forces mind you - or b) it's more abject lying to a moronic public that is mesmerized by either or of these puppets.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1011312.html

Truth be told, the Russian conflict is really an election blessing for both of these guys. Again, either with no knowledge of what's really going on, or blatant lies, they're being provided with the perfect soapbox to stand on, acting tough and fooling voters into believing that they'll protect us from terrorists. It helps further perpetuate the rhetoric that McCain is so tough on terror, and is a foreign policy mastermind, and it further erases doubt that Obama isn't ready to protect America.

Probably the highlight of the week's charade came on Monday when McCain said that invading a sovereign nation was "in clear violation of international law" and has "no place in 21st Century Europe."

It's fine, though, that the U.S. has attacked two sovereign nations over the past 6-1/2 years, and are gearing up to go for three in Iran. McCain whole-heartedly supports these actions, however. Perhaps that's why he did say 21st Century "Europe." The same rules obviously don't apply to the Middle East or Central Asia.

Neo-Con Hubris Reaches New Heights

Now that it's all but admitted that factions of the U.S. Government are behind Georgia's attacks against Russian military bases and civilians in the provinces of Ossetia and Abkhazia, it's apparent the Neo-Cons are more reckless than ever, and are going to leave one heck of a mark before departing in January.

Media across the world (aside from the corporate-owned media in the U.S. and England) are reporting that at least two black mercenary soldiers with American flags festooned on black uniforms have been found dead, and one black merc with American regalia has been captured along with Georgian aggressors.

www.infowars.com/?p=3871

http://www.prisonplanet.com/civilian-genocide-dead-americans-cost-of-us-russia-proxy-war.html

http://www.prisonplanet.com/american-mercenary-captured-by-russians.html

It's bad enough that the U.S. is using Georgia as a proxy to attack Russia, but how much bolder could they be than sending in black guys, likely employed by Blackwater (given the black uniforms) with American flags on their Darth Vader uniforms. It couldn't possibly get more blatantly arrogant. The media makes it even worse by acting as if Russia is the evildoer here.

http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2008/08/11/2904/russias_attacks_reviving_cold_war_worries

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hV2N6fVKS5slf10A13Dj_uIdaZ4QD92FDSLG0

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/33836.html

Of course, the Neo-Cons have probably calculated well enough that the overwhelming majority of American sheeple will not even know this is going on - given the fact the Olympics are in full-swing, and John Edwards may have a love child. Double insurance probably rests on the fact that most Americans who have heard this story probably think that Russia has attacked the southern U.S. state of Georgia to, as Alex Jones said yesterday, "get our peaches."

It's not as if we can rely on the MSM to accurately or fairly report any of this. After all, we just had Dick Cheney recently accused of planning the next 9/11, and it was nowhere to be found on U.S. news.

As we speak, Russia is steamrolling Georgia, and at any moment could destroy them if they wanted to. Of course, if they were to dare bombard Georgia in retaliation, they would be called terrorist aggressors, and condemned - at the very least - by the U.S. and the West. More likely, a forceful Russian response would be met by further hardcore actions by the NATO forces, and a complete escalation. Russia would then naturally be labeled as in league with al-Qaeda - in the same vain that Iran would be labeled terrorists if Israel bombed them to hell and back, and had the audacity to fight back and protect themselves.

Speaking of Iran, it's all too convenient that the U.S. is stirring the pot in the former Soviet region as it steps up its plans for an attack against Iran. More U.S. forces are being moved into waters off of Iran as we speak.

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5499

The Russians, of course, have warned the U.S. from some time now that an attack on Iran would not be met lightly. What better way to divert attention than to have the Russians caught up in their own mess?

For those who don't think we're backing Georgia - just look it up; but for a quick figure - Georgia has had the third largest military presence in Iraq (some 3000 troops). They have now pulled those troops out to fight this new proxy war, but they have certainly been our lapdogs for a long time.

Not to be lost in all of this are the calls for Russia to stop the violence (remember, they were attacked first) by our President, and the two morons running to take his spot. McCain was quoted this morning as saying, "Russian President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin must understand the severe, long-term negative consequences that their government’s actions will have for Russia’s relationship with the U.S. and Europe."

Bush and Cheney have also made their tough-guy stances, warning Russia to back off - complete insanity considering they're behind it all!

If this whole situation was not such a dark harbinger, the Neo-Con statements would be up for jokes of the month.

Clinton: From "First Black Prez" to Racist? So say Obama Camp and the MSM

Since way back in the early 1990s, Bill Clinton was unofficially tabbed "America's First Black President." Both the black community and the corporate media had no problem in perpetuating this myth right up through this year's Primary season.

Now the Obama camp is claiming Bill is a racist, based on certain semi-distasteful remarks he made during the heated battle between Hillary and Barack. In and of itself, this is more meaningless nonsense - regardless of Bill's true feelings. What is the issue here, is that we have the Vice President scheming up the next false flag terror attack, we have the government running around imprisoning everyone for the 2001 anthrax attacks - subsequently killing suspects while in custody - with absolutely no just cause, and it's come out that the White House was already taking Cipro - an anti-Anthrax pill - the day before 9/11?

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3736

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/03/journalism/

These are smoking guns! Hell, they're smoking missiles! Is the MSM covering any of this? Aside from a few log cabins here and a couple of caves there, you can't find anything on this stuff. Yet, I just finished watching a 20-minute discussion on CNN about whether Bill Clinton is racist. It's even gotten to the point where the most respected living American journalist, Seymour Hersh, is taking a rather lassie-fare approach to the White House's criminality.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/cheney-weighs-fratricide-to-sell-war-on-iran.html

It's always been said the media were the fourth branch of government. Given the criminal activities of the original three branches over the past decade or so, they certainly fit right in - and certainly deserve the official crowning as the fourth corner of the tyrannical box we're trappped in.

Cheney Tried to Stir Up the Next 9/11

It seems our murderer of a Vice President tried to get our military to carry out another 9/11 - this time under the guise of fake warships blown up by the Iranians.

Pulitzer winning journalist Seymour Hersh was taped by Think Progress saying, on the table was “how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,” part of an ongoing effort to provide an excuse to attack Iran. “There was a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war.

“There was a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war,” Hersh explains. “The one that interested me the most was why don’t we build — we in our shipyard — build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats. Put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up.”

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3681

It's not like this is very surprising, but it is appalling that the MSM is not covering this at all. It's fine to cover Barack Obama going to the bathroom, or John McCain having lunch, but who cares about our Vice President lobbying for WWIV?

The underlying message of this story should be a slap in the face to those who still think 9/11 was carried out by a bunch of cave dwellers.

"How could our government kill 3000 of our citizens?" Well, just look up and read, Sally Soccer Mom. They're hell-bent on doing it again!

When is the public going to wake up? We aren't making these things up. Gulf of Tonkin, 1993 WTC Bombing, OKC, 9/11... it just never ends with these megalomaniacs. When there is an agenda to be carried out, they just kill a bunch of us and the support for the next step is solidified.

NWO Obama Cries Out for One-World Government

Barack Obama further displayed his globalist, New World Order intent yesterday during his speech to some 200,000 sheep in Berlin. The mesmerizing rhetoric was in full swing, as Obama won over the hearts and minds of Europe's most easily brainwashed. He basically called for a "one-world" in which there are no walls, no borders.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/24/obama.speech/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail

Seemingly harmless enough on its face, as it smacks of a whole "we are the world"-type scenario. The trouble is, this is a fancy dress being put on the horrifying ogre being implemented by the global elite Bilderbergers - a one-world government in which all 6-billion plus of us are complete and total slaves under a single set of globalist masters.

This is what makes Obama just as dangerous as John McCain - just in a different way. McCain makes no attempt to hide the fact he loves the war in Iraq, wants to be there for 100 years or more, can wait to attack Iran, etc. Obama acts like he wants to get out of Iraq, says he opposed the war from the get go, and on and on. Of course he won't get us out of Iraq either, because even if elected, he'll control nothing. It's this empty but unfortunately galvanizing rhetoric, however, that is fooling way too many people for our own good.

Not only does he have the blacks and guilty white liberals fooled, he has half of Europe fleeced now, too.

Kucinich Readies for Friday's Showdown

Congressman Dennis Kucinich will take the next step toward the impeachment of George W. Bush on Friday when he goes before the House Judiciary Committee with an article citing abuse of Executive Power, in particular in the lead up to the Iraq war. Yesterday Kucinich dropped in on the Alex Jones Show and pleaded with listeners to contact their representatives, as well as all media outlets, and let them know just how important this hearing is. He also posted a YouTube video on Wednesday which again outlined the fundamentals and reasoning for his latest impeachment article.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/kucinich-vs-the-establishment-impeachment-hearing-on-friday.html

While the criminality of the Bush Administration is an open-and-shut case, and the overwhelming majority of Americans support impeachment, leading Democrats continue to try and brush Kucinich and his articles aside, with a endless amount of empty and insulting arguments. Further evidence that aside from certain window dressing rhetoric, there's no difference between the parties.

In a sickening - if not surprising - last-minute move, Judiciary Chair John Conyers is now trying to relegate the hearing to one that's as short and ineffectual as possible. He has said, "no one at Friday's impeachment hearing can accuse Bush or Cheney of any crime, or any impeachable offense, or dishonorable conduct, or even lying." Then what is the point of the hearing, John?

This remark comes one week after Conyers was quoted as saying, “credible allegations of serious misconduct” by Bush and Cheney need to be researched and reviewed. More doublespeak from one of the most treasonous closet Neo-Con admirers on the Left.

Kucinich also pointed out on Wednesday that moving forward with impeachment may just slow down the Neo-Cons' plans for an attack on Iran. As Bush and Co. near the end of their reign, an attack appears ever more likely.

Whatever does happen on Friday, we all need pray for the Congressman's well-being. He's certainly crossed the rubicon when it comes to dealing with these murderers, and don't forget what happened to Paul Wellstone in 2002 after he wouldn't be strong-armed by Dick Cheney.

http://www.opednews.com/thoreau1203_wellstone_assassinated.htm

Just two days ago, Congressman Ron Paul narrowly dodged what was likely an assassination attempt when his plane needed an emergency landing because of a depressurized cabin. In a twist of irony, but not likely coincidence, Dr. Paul and six other congress members were on their way to vote on The Aviation Safety Enhancement Act of 2008.

http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou080722_tj_congressplane.7f4faa58.html

Paul's position on the issue is - to say the least - not favorable toward the FAA or the Government. Hmm...

More Color-Coding from the Neo-Cons

With the foundation of lies and propaganda laid solid, U.S. Defense Dept. officials now claim that Bush is poised to support a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran. Allegedly, the Chimp in Chief has given the "amber light" on the utter annihilation of Tehran.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/13/bush-supports-israeli-pla_n_112367.html

Could the Neo-Cons be any more fascinated with assigning hues to all things related to "terror" and the Middle East? Before I sat down to write, I probably should have double checked what shade of al-Qaeda threat we're currently under. Not that it matters anyway, but I'm sure I'll find it soon enough. No doubt it's streaming minute to minute on the Fox News ticker.

Incidentally, "Amber means get on with your preparations, stand by for immediate attack and tell us when you're ready," the [Pentagon] official said.

Bush's blessing comes right as Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak visits Washington this week for "consultations" on Iran. Last week, it was Mossad chief Meir Dagan in town. Two weeks ago, it was U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, in Israel.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/109427.html

Maybe it's all just a straight run of coincidence, but this seems like an awful lot of coordination if there's nothing on the immediate horizon. Even the Iraqi government had to scold the U.S. late last week for using Iraq airspace and U.S. bases in Iraq to take off, land, and run drills.

http://www.daily.pk/world/worldnews/84-worldnews/5481-israeli-jets-using-iraqs-airspace.html

This is rather reminiscent of our massing troops and weapons in Afghanistan's neighbors like Uzbekistan and Tajikistan days before 9/11 - knowing the attacks were coming, and knowing we were going to invade. Who knows if there's a false flag operation in store for us, as a pretext for bombing the heck out of Iran, but there are just way too many State visits back and forth for all of this to amount to nothing.

Can we say $400/barrel oil?

Is Iran a Threat or Not? Make Up Your Neo-Con Minds!

Let's take a trip back to this past Wednesday. Iran test-fired long-range missles, threatening the poor U.S. and the Zionists in Isarael. A top Israeli spokesman said, "The Iranian nuclear program and the Iranian ballistic missle program must be of concern for the entire national community."

One day later, U.S. intelligence is running around saying Iran did NOT fire long-range missles. Instead, they claim Iran set off up to seven short-to-medium range missles. So which is it? Are they antagonizing Israel and the West, and are they a dreaded nuclear foe, or are they makng up stories of their capabilities? Regardless of the answer, does Israel need our "obligation to help our allies defend themselves...?"

Well, if a country that has 400 nukes needs to be protected from a nation that arugably can't get more than three missles off of the ground (per the whole 3 of 4 Photoshop U.S./Israeli intelligence argument), they're pretty pathetic. Of couse, this isn't the mindset though. Rather, Israel continues to use the U.S. as a puppet as it runs around the Middle East breaking every law and enforcing every shady treaty it can to prohibit its neighbors from possessing nuclear weapon defense. Israel can do what it wants, when it wants, but God forbid anyone else dare.

It's tragically comic that this latest outrage stems from a half-assed missle test by Iran, given that last month Israel ran hard-core drillls over Eurpoe intended to intimindate the Iranians.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article4178960.ece

This is not a religous blog. This is not an anti-Israel blog. Don't even think about starting some kind of faith-based b.s. argument here and emailing me with Zionest crap. I do, however, refuse to stay silent while our country is dipped further into debt and winless war because our puppet strings are pulled by the Israelis. IT NEEDS TO STOP!

Iran Employing Radical Islamic... Monkeys?

The criminal governments of the U.S., Israel and England have been ramping up the Iran propaganda lately with an increasing line of complete b.s. The Iranians are building nukes, they want to wipe Israel off the map (yes, they're still using that one), they're driving up the price of oil, and on and on and on. The fear mongering appears to have hit an all-time level of absurdity however.

A Sunday article in the Times of London said that there is great fear of germ warfare because thousands of monkeys have been shipped from Tanzania to Iran and are being housed in ultra-secret labs. The argument is that the monkeys are being used in bio-warfare tests. I realize that the public is getting wiser every day to the out-and-out lies we're fed, and the globalists therefore need to come up with some new material. This, however, is a new level of comedy. I guess if they ultimately can't get the public to buy into Iran having nukes that could reach Cincinnati, they'll try and fall back on extremist simians.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article4276460.ece

Keep an eye out for upcoming "leaked" videos of bearded monkeys in turbans practicing guerrilla warfare drills at al-Qaeda camps. Because remember folks, Iran may be Shiite, but they're the ones running al-Qaeda groups in Iraq.

The Times also ran an article today which basically chastised Iran for suggesting they would dare fight back if attacked. The article cited Iran's claim that an attack by the U.S. and Israel would be met with, among other things, the burning of Tel Aviv. Obviously the Iranians are expected to sit there and take one 2000-lb bomb after another and say or do nothing.

The propaganda piece also reiterated that Israel will simply not allow Iran to have any capability to make even one nuke. It's alright though that the Israelis have 400 of them.

This is all just too familiar to six years ago and the lead-up to Shock and Awe. The MSM is doing their best to make sure the end result is the same, but fortunately, I've yet to see the ignorant fervor from the public. We'll see what happens in the next four months.

Obama's Platform Begins to Materialize, and It's a Joke

We've listened to Barack Obama for months on end say absolutely nothing aside from how he represents "change." We've seen him weasel his way out of despicable associations with the likes of Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger - both of whom are openly anti-White, although Pfleger himself is white. We've had to listen to his wretched wife talk about how disgraced she is to be an American. And so we've waited and waited and waited to hear some sort of policy stance.

Well that's now materializing, and not shockingly, it's pretty darn similar to that of John McCain. Over the the past couple of weeks, both candidates have gone from saying they would not accept public campaign financing to saying they would. On the war front(s), we know McCain is a complete chicken hawk psycho, but Obama's camp came out the other day saying all options are on the table in regards to Iran. Nearly a year ago, Obama also said he would certainly consider military action against Pakistan.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20070536/

Today he had to call two separate press conferences in North Dakota about the same thing: Iraq. That's because he first said he would be open to changing his stance on the war in Iraq after a visit to the country. I guess he quickly realized he slipped up and admitted what anyone with half a brain already knows and that is he has no intention of ending the war. So, he called the media shills back and half-heartedly backpedaled.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080703/pl_nm/usa_politics_obama_iraq1_dc

And let's not forget the shady backdoor meeting he held with Hillary back on June 6 right outside of D.C. - the same night the 2008 Bilderberg meeting got underway in nearby Chantilly, VA. This unannounced meeting was abetted by locking press members inside Obama's plane and shipping them back off to Chicago before they had any idea Obama was not on board.

Sure, he's charming and a dynamic speaker. He's likely the slightly better alternative (only because McCain is The Manchurian Candidate - literally), but like I've been saying, we waited for the true colors to come out, and they are dark indeed.

McCain, Obama and the Race to Tehran

Let's face it... the race to prove who's tougher on Iran has begun. It's absolutely incredible that we haven't learned from the past five years and the absolute annihilation we've suffered in Iraq. Now we're witnessing the election-year posturing regarding Iran. We all know McCain is all for the complete destruction of a country his supporters can't find on a map. What is genuinly surprising, however, is that Obama's Campaign Communications Director, Robert Gibbs has told CNN that "no options are off the table" in regards to Iran.

For a candidate that continues to spout the fact he did NOT vote for the Iraq war, this is pretty hysterical (although not funny at all). The only reason Obama did not vote for the war in Iraq is that he had not yet taken office at the time of the resolution. Is there anyone alive - Republican or Democratc - who thinks he would have cast a "nay" if in public office at that point? Sadly, yes. Every mainline liberal in the U.S.

We need to pay very close attention to both sides of this issue over the next few months. At this point, we have no faction of our goverment acting towards the best interests of the American people.

But then again, who cares about the American people? If the majority of power did, we would not be in Iraq, we would not be printing money out of thin air, we would not be instigating illegal wars, we would not be on the verge of economic depression, martial law, and the Second Revolution in the history of the United States. Keep pushing us, New World Order. You're going to find out what the meaning of revolt is.

The March To Tehran

Thank you Seymour Hersh of The New Yorker for your "breaking news" piece on the Neo-Cons' amped-up aggressions toward Iran. You're only a few months late though. Any reputable alternative media site has been reporting for three years now that Washington has been incrementally building towards a mega-attack on Iran. Truthfully, the U.S. has been passively attacking Tehran and it's outlying areas for up to five years now, but things look like they're about to go Shock and Awe style before George and Dick leave office in January.

Despite the fact that warships have been moving in for the past 18 months, and the rhetoric has been growing (recall - Iran backs al-Qaeda), the past few days have been the first time the MSM has really begun to let on that we're headed toward yet another illegal war.

Speaking of Iran backing al-Qaeda... the MSM has been championing this talking point for quite some time. However, this New Yorker piece is probably the first MSM evidence that the CIA is behind these breakaway faction, Sunni terrorist groups that have been wreaking havoc in Iran. Once more, let's recap. Any aggressive, bomb-happy, outlaw terrorist group found in the Middle East or Central Asia is almost always Sunni. Iran is a Shiite nation. Arch enemies of these so-called al-Qaeda groups. It doesn't matter though. The MSM will spin and spin, and the average moron on the streets of the U.S. will continue to believe that Iranians are evil Arab Sunnis in league with al-Qaeda. All the while, this latest report alleges that our Congress rubber-stamped $400 million for Bush to have the CIA rile up these groups and have them go on a bombing raid inside of Iran.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/june2008/300608Iran_Covert.htm

As far back as 2005, U.N. Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter went on record as saying that intelligence gathering and the mobilization of indigenous opposition groups (Sunni al-Qaeda) are all being carried out by the CIA-backed special forces routed in Iran. One of the favorite M.O.s of these groups are massive suicide bombings on mosques, buses, schools, and the rest of it. Funny how these same attacks within Iraq are reason for us to stay there and demonize that set of Middle Eastern people.

It also appears that one of the largest groups our CIA is currently backing in it's antagonizing of the Iranians is the MEK (Mujahedeen-e Khalq), an anti-Shiite Iranian rebel group once fully supported by Saddam Hussein. This is a group also alleged to have supported the 1979 takeover of the Iranian U.S. Embassy and taking of American hostages for 444 days. But like always, we cherry pick our rules and morals. Don't forget, we've been both friend and foe in less than 30 years with both Osama bin-Laden and Saddam Hussein.

The Neo-Con Stretch Run

We're rapidly approaching the last half-year of the Bush Administration's tour of tyranny and terror. While the general public is running around asking "Obama or McCain?" "Who will be the VP nominees?" and "Lakers or Celtics?", the real question every American should be asking his or herself is: "What grand finale do the Neo-Cons have in store for us?"

There has been a rash of potentially ominous statements recently from the Neo-Con camp. Of course there's the ongoing talking point of "all options are on the table" regarding Iran. It's no secret that Bush, Cheney and the rest of them are absolutely clawing at the walls in anticipation of annihilating the Iranians. This has been on the table for years. Ron Paul stood before the House as far back as 2004 and pled for our criminal regime to exercise restraint in regards to Iran. The only potential saving grace is that at last week's Bilderberg meeting in Chantilly, Va., the European contingent was dead set against the U.S. attacking Iran. Hopefully, this will be enought to stall the aggression.

There have been some frightening similarities over the past year or so between Iran-related overtures, and the lead-up to the war with Iraq. Aside from the White House rhetoric, there has been the positioning of three U.S. warships right outside of Iranian waters, as well as nonsensical attempts to link Iran to al-Qaeda. Remember that Iran is Shiite. The opposite branch of Islam, and eternal enemies of the Sunni al-Qaeda. Of course, al-Qaeda as it's been portrayed doesn't exist. But the small terrorist groups that actually do run around bombing buses and such are indeed Sunni, based out of Saudi Arabia.

Then we have Bush demanding "bring me Bin Laden before I leave office." Now, by all legitimate (ie - non MSM) accounts, Osama has been dead for a long time. Whether he is still running around the caves of Afghanistan or not is completely irrelevant. This ultimatum from Bush could very well mean a late fall/early winter appearance of another staged video. We could well be looking at footage of a blown up cave, or an operative dressed up in Muslim garb with a fake beard. Complete with the proclamation that we've finally, after more than seven years, captured the boogeyman. This would naturally justify the entire war on terror, and proactively justify any subsequent wars or infringements on liberty that McCain or Obama have in store for the American people.

We also saw Newt Gingrich in the past couple of days spew more terror mongering and propaganda. This time in response to the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in favor of Habeas Corpus. At least one branch of the government still has a few (if very few) scruples. The high court ruled that it is not constitutional to round up anyone the government wants and deny them of due process - whether or not they are suspected of potential terrorism. Well, that just isn't going to fly with Newt.

Gingrich pronounced that the result of this ruling will be the destruction of an American city. That of course is code for a nuclear attack on a U.S. metropolis. While the general public will buy this wholesale, it's an unbelievable attempt at fear mongering. Gingrich is no doubt insinuating that al-Qaeda will nuke one of our major cities if we're not able to round everyone up and throw them into a black hole. The problem with this is twofold. First, al-Qaeda doesn't exist. Secondly, even if you want to believe they're hiding in your bathtub, they're not Pakistan, they're not China, they're not India, and they're not Israel. They... don't... have... nukes.