Terrorizing Harbingers?

The modus operandi of the week? Prepare Americans' mental and emotional states for the next "terror attack."

According to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, war criminal Colin Powell, and Vice Prez candidate Joe Biden, something big is looming on the horizon if Barack Obama were to be elected two weeks from today. One might think Chertoff and Powell were endorsing McCain, and that Biden had completely gone off the reservation. However, this is almost assuredly a subtle attempt to plant the idea of an upcoming "terror attack" in the minds of the American public. One that would result in Obama swooping in to be our "savior" and launch yet another illegal and illogical attack on a soverign foreign nation.

After all, with the election debates, Sarah Palin's embarrassing appearance on Saturday Night Live, and the state of the economy, the run of the mill idiot voter probably hasn't spent much time lately searching their bathtub and cupboards for guys in beards and turbans before they go to sleep.

Enter more manufactured fear.

First we have Secretary Chertoff. He says "the U.S. may be vulnerable to a terrorist attack during the next six months, with violent groups more likely to try to take advantage of a new president and administration."

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=auIWPps4p6cg&refer=home

Then there's Obama's running mate, Joe Biden, who says that during Obama's first six months as Prez, "the world [will test] Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy." The Kennedy reference has to do with the narrowly averted Bay of Pigs disaster of course. And naturally this is what Biden chooses to cite, and what the media pigs choose to run with. Not the horrific track record in recent years of presidential terms beginning with "terror."

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/20/biden-obama-tested-world-months-administration/

First we have the initial attempt to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993 - at this point, no question an inside job.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/wtcbomb.html

Conveniently, this occurred a month and six days after Bill Clinton's inauguration.

Fast forward to 9/11/2001. I won't even bother to post links here. That would be insulting to anyone with a brain. But for the record, it took place seven months and 22 days after Dubbya's inauguration.

Now for the horrific 7/7 bus/train bombings in London (and don't think for a second that whatever happens in the U.S. and Britain isn't eternally linked between the two). That took place on 7/7/05. Exactly five months and 17 days after Bush was sworn in for the second time.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2005/201205finalfinalword.htm

Then there's Colin Powell. Bear in mind he should be in jail (or even dead, for that matter, via execution) for playing such a major role in the WMD lie that has killed nearly 4200 U.S. troops, millions of Iraqis, and God knows what other ultimate disasters. Instead, he's still looming, and came out in support of Obama and had this to say:

"The problems will always be there and there’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now."

http://www.infowars.com/?p=5461

Fear mongering at its finest from all of these crooks. Let us hope that over the next few months we find a way to derail what is looming.

Ron Paul Lays Out How Simplistically Horrible the Bailout Is

Congressman Ron Paul was back on CNN this morning talking again about the criminal bailout. The talking heads were trying to get Dr. Paul to shift on his positions given that the crooks on Capitol Hill "tweaked it [the bailout plan] and decided to buy stakes in some U.S. banks."

I guess Dr. Paul did move a little from statements he made the last time he was on CNN - he emphatically said the bill is worse now than in its previous incarnation.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/17/ron.paul.qa/

Ron Paul is no doubt a brilliant economic mind. However, it doesn't take anywhere near brilliance to see the catastrophic pitfalls in what is going on here. Dr. Paul was able to sum up the whole mess with extremely succinct points. For example, he pointed out that the bailout is asking [though I would say enforcing via economic martial law] the poor to get the rich off of the hook. He explained that all of their "tweaks" have turned a $700-billion donation to the robber barrons into what will ultimatly cost Americans $5 trillion. The $5 trillion figure has been out there for a while now, of course nowhere to be found on the cable news shows or in the New York Times.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=4813

Perhaps the most obvious problem with this crookery is that paying for it will result in $6 loaves of bread and $10 gallons of milk. The money has to come from somewhere. Well, Dr. Paul laid that out, too.

He also repeated one of his favorite and truest lines, "If creating more money was the solution, nobody would ever have to work."

"This is going to cause a great deal of harm. It's like a drug addict taking a strong fix, and he feels better for a day or two, but believe me, we're going to kill the patient, Paul said. "And the patient here is the dollar system and our entire world economy. I would say let's get off this addiction."

All Fun and Games When You're Part of the Establishment

In a disgusting display of hubris and complete lack of caring for suffering Americans, Barack Obama and John McCain broke bread, laughed at each other - themselves and anything else -and looked like complete buffoons last night at Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner to benefit Catholic charities in New York.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/obama-and-mccai.html

While Americans are losing their jobs, their homes, and struggling to feed themselves, these two elitist pigs used the guise of a fundraiser and "roast," to hob knob with the jet set and match senses of humor.

I'm not supporting either of these clowns, so I don't particularly take this personally, but I think supporters of both men should be highly insulted and feel rather betrayed. After all, most voters believe their candidate cares about them and their problems.

We're 18 days away from choosing of these guys to be our next leader - during arguably the worst time for this nation in the past 100 years. Yet once again they've proven their nothing more than opposite sides of the same coin, interested in nothing but coming up with hardly witty things like:

"I can't shake that feeling that some people here are pulling for me," McCain said, turning to the far side of the stage. "I'm delighted to see you here tonight, Hillary."

McCain said that his rival was not fazed by being called, "That one," during the second presidential debate. "He doesn't mind at all,” McCain said, “in fact, he even has a pet name for me: George Bush.”

"I do love the Waldorf Astoria,” Obama said. “I hear from the doorstep you can see all the way to the Russian Tea Room." It prompted much laughter from McCain.

“Contrary to the rumors you have heard, I was not born in a manger,” Obama said. “I was actually born on Krypton and sent here by my father Jor-El to save the planet Earth.”

Wow. We're in BIG trouble.

"Screw Loose Change" Needs to Get Screwed!

I realize the idiotic dweebs at "Screw Loose Change" are nothing new to 9/11 Truthers' ire and, quite frankly, laughs - because of how pathetic their vapid arguments are. However, in my few months of this blog, I have never taken a shot at them personally. Now, I have an overwhelming urge to comment on them, and I will apologize in advance to my readers, and say what I have to say.

These retards have spent the past three years futily attempting to debunk the Loose Change videos, the We Are Change conquests, and the 9/11 Truth movement in general. In the process they have made a significant name for themselves - via the corrupt and even MORE retarded mainstream media - but have also exposed themselves as one of two things; government co-intel operatives, or, the most fleeced, moronic and oblivious government-loving fools in recent history.

How did I get on this topic? Classic case of surfing. One thing led to another, led to another, and I found myself at the Screw Loose blogspot page. From there, I discovered a sub page maintained by one of the two pathetic shills that purport the government sponsored propaganda. It's called "The Chief Brief." Now, if that isn't the most pathetic grasp at wannabe-clever alliteration I've seen, words then escape me. The creator of the blog claims to be "a software geek... and part-time Chief Warrant Officer in the Army National Guard." Well, hey, National Guard, he must be right!

Guaranteed that this individual is one of the National Guardsmen chomping at the bit to gun down American citizens who oppose the "Bailout," the illegal government spying, and every other infringement on our Constitution. But, I digress.

On to some of the insanity posted on this Chief Brief rag.

I am getting more and more annoyed at these academic frauds, called the "Scholars for 9'11 Truth." Fortunately, their peers and the media seem to be picking them up and debunking them. - http://thechiefbrief.blogspot.com/2006/06/those-wacky-scholars.html

Uh, huh. Not like Scholars for 9/11 Truth is gaining membership, momentum, and credibility every day. Then again, this was posted more than two years ago, when morons still didn't believe the Truth Movement would prevail, and thus, it was safe to irrationally bash, make fun, and attempt to discredit.

Like all conspiracy theorists, they rely not on the scientific method but by focusing on third-generation rumors distorted from the original, and then the complete avoidance of any information that might contradict their theory. - http://thechiefbrief.blogspot.com/2006/05/truth-on-911-rumors.html

First off, the 9/11 movement backs up three-fold everything it claims - from the Loose Change crew, to David Ray Griffin's books, to the Alex Jones show. Secondly, unlike the supporters of the official fable, we don't rely on mainstream propaganda, Neo-Con rhetoric, or whitewashes by Bush/Cheney-selected commissions.

I have covered 9/11 conspiracy theorists in the past, and with the release of the movie United 93, they are starting to come out of the woodwork even more. - http://thechiefbrief.blogspot.com/2006/04/loose-change-loose-screw.html

You're g-damn right! There's never been a bigger fairytale motion picture full of government/intelligence propaganda to ever hit the big screen. Arab patsies. Box cutters. A bumbling air defense. Every Arabic catch phrase one can possibly imagine uttered by the "villains." A rag-tag bunch of passengers taking over a plane...

Then there's this blog: http://thechiefbrief.blogspot.com/2006/02/moonbattery-explained.html.

This is just a pathetic attempt to explain the fake CIA-borne bin-Laden videos, the lies regarding al-Qaeda's claim of responsibility for the 9/11 attacks, and on and on.

Frankly, I can't take anymore. But take one thing away with you... why is it that the most recent 9/11-related post on this rag is dated 3/22/08? Why is the next most recent dated 9/18/07? Maybe because they're running out of lies? Running of of propaganda? Maybe because the Truth movement is exploding and no one can logically deny it any longer?

All of the above!

New War Memorial a Literal Mural of Lies

Ground was broken Oct. 5 in Albuquerque, NM for a memorial honoring fallen New Mexican veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Sadly, the developers are well-meaning idiots, however, as the memorial is adorned with various images of the 9/11 attacks - completely irrelevant and disrespectful to those who've given their lives in the Middle East and Central Asia.

http://www.military.com/news/article/bad-link-memorial-ties-iraq-war-911.html

According to a story in the Albuquerque Journal, the $300,000 memorial at the New Mexico Veterans' Memorial Park is slated to be finished by late Spring of 2009. While the memorial is not subject to city council approval, the 9/11 propaganda it contains is drawing some opposition.

"We want to make sure that we don't revise history before history is even written," Councilor Rey Garduo said. "In no way am I questioning whether we should honor our fallen heroes. But in no way should we connect Iraq and terrorism."

According to the Journal article, the proposed memorial features a ring of laser-etched granite blocks depicting the 9/11 attacks and other images, including maps and photos of the attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., and of the hijacked plane that went down in Somerset County, Pa. It also features five empty dress uniforms cast in bronze hanging in lockers that form a ring around a central pillar.

One brainwashed Iraq veteran said, "The conflict in which we are engaged in is officially referred to as the war on terror. The fact is that both campaigns [Iraq and Afghanistan] are wrapped up in the war on terror, which originated with the attacks on 9/11. Chronologically, (the wars) started with the attacks on 9/11."

It's sad that after seven years there are still folks out there who equate 9/11 with Iraq and Afghanistan. Even if you believe the official lie, not a single one of the alleged 19 al-CIA-da hijackers was from either Iraq or Afghanistan.

Charles Powell, president of the Albuquerque chapter of Veterans for Peace, summed it up beautifully when he said the memorial falsely links the 9/ 11 attacks with the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, and that "to connect the war in Iraq with 9/11 is clearly a political thing. We don't feel that it's really an honor to put up a memorial to the brave men and women who died in Iraq to put on that memorial a false connection with 9/11."